mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

What Concepts Lie Within? Detecting and Suppressing Risky Content in Diffusion Transformers

arXiv 2605.10180 ↗First posted 11 May 2026cs.CV cs.CRcited by 1

On the map: Diffusion models → Robustness, privacy and adversarial aspects

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

The rise of text-to-image (T2I) models has increasingly raised concerns regarding the generation of risky content, such as sexual, violent, and copyright-protected images, highlighting the need for effective safeguards within the models themselves. Although existing methods have been proposed to eliminate risky concepts from T2I models, they are primarily developed for earlier U-Net architectures, leaving the state-of-the-art Diffusion-Transformer-based T2I models inadequately protected. This gap stems from a fundamental architectural shift: Diffusion Transformers (DiTs) entangle semantic injection and visual synthesis via joint attention, which makes it difficult to isolate and erase risky content within the generation. To bridge this gap, we investigate how semantic concepts are represented in DiTs and discover that attention heads exhibit concept-specific sensitivity. This property enables both the detection and suppression of risky content. Building on this discovery, we propose AHV-D&S, a training-free inference-time safeguard for image generation in DiTs. Specifically, AHV-D&S quantifies each textual token's sensitivity across all attention heads as an Attention Head Vector (AHV), which serves as a discriminative signature for detecting risky generation tendencies. In the inference stage, we propose a momentum-based strategy to dynamically track token-wise AHVs across denoising steps, and a sensitivity-guided adaptive suppression strategy that suppresses the attention weights of identified risky tokens based on head-specific risk scores. Extensive experiments demonstrate that AHV-D&S effectively suppresses sexual, copyrighted-style, and various harmful content while preserving visual quality, and further exhibits strong robustness against adversarial prompts and transferability across different DiT-based T2I models.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Robustness, privacy and adversarial aspects, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 22 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2026.

Builds on

22 of 40 references.

Closest ancestors · 9

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025SPEED: Scalable, Precise, and Efficient Concept Erasure for Diffusion Models10 Mar
  2. 2024TraSCE: Trajectory Steering for Concept Erasure10 Dec
  3. 2024SAFREE: Training-Free and Adaptive Guard for Safe Text-to-Image And Video Generation16 Oct
  4. 2024MACE: Mass Concept Erasure in Diffusion Models10 Mar
  5. 2023MMA-Diffusion: MultiModal Attack on Diffusion Models29 Nov
  6. 2023To Generate or Not? Safety-Driven Unlearned Diffusion Models Are Still Easy To Generate Unsafe Images ... For Now18 Oct
  7. 2023Ring-A-Bell! How Reliable are Concept Removal Methods for Diffusion Models?16 Oct
  8. 2023Unified Concept Editing in Diffusion Models25 Aug
  9. 2022Safe Latent Diffusion: Mitigating Inappropriate Degeneration in Diffusion Models9 Nov

Other references · 13

  1. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  2. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
  3. 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,255
  4. 2024Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,181
  5. 2022Prompt-to-Prompt Image Editing with Cross Attention Controlcited by 2,431
  6. 2025Qwen-Image Technical Reportcited by 1,044
  7. 2025Emerging Properties in Unified Multimodal Pretrainingcited by 897
  8. 2025Z-Image: An Efficient Image Generation Foundation Model with Single-Stream Diffusion Transformercited by 277
  9. 2025Show-o2: Improved Native Unified Multimodal Modelscited by 250
  10. 2025ConceptAttention: Diffusion Transformers Learn Highly Interpretable Featurescited by 52
  11. 2025T2I-RiskyPrompt: A Benchmark for Safety Evaluation, Attack, and Defense on Text-to-Image Modelcited by 17
  12. 2025Reason2Attack: Jailbreaking Text-to-Image Models via LLM Reasoningcited by 15
1 more
  1. 2025SafeGuider: Robust and Practical Content Safety Control for Text-to-Image Modelscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Localized Concept Erasure in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models via High-Level Representation Misdirection
  2. 2023The Hidden Language of Diffusion Models
  3. 2024Growth Inhibitors for Suppressing Inappropriate Image Concepts in Diffusion Models
  4. 2025Detect-and-Guide: Self-regulation of Diffusion Models for Safe Text-to-Image Generation via Guideline Token Optimization
  5. 2024Concept Arithmetics for Circumventing Concept Inhibition in Diffusion Models
  6. 2025Prompt-Based Safety Guidance Is Ineffective for Unlearned Text-to-Image Diffusion Models
  7. 2024Six-CD: Benchmarking Concept Removals for Benign Text-to-image Diffusion Models
  8. 2026Introspective Attention Modulation for Safe Text-to-Image Generation