Prompt-Based Safety Guidance Is Ineffective for Unlearned Text-to-Image Diffusion Models
On the map: Diffusion models → Robustness, privacy and adversarial aspects
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in text-to-image generative models have raised concerns about their potential to produce harmful content when provided with malicious input text prompts. To address this issue, two main approaches have emerged: (1) fine-tuning the model to unlearn harmful concepts and (2) training-free guidance methods that leverage negative prompts. However, we observe that combining these two orthogonal approaches often leads to marginal or even degraded defense performance. This observation indicates a critical incompatibility between two paradigms, which hinders their combined effectiveness. In this work, we address this issue by proposing a conceptually simple yet experimentally robust method: replacing the negative prompts used in training-free methods with implicit negative embeddings obtained through concept inversion. Our method requires no modification to either approach and can be easily integrated into existing pipelines. We experimentally validate its effectiveness on nudity and violence benchmarks, demonstrating consistent improvements in defense success rate while preserving the core semantics of input prompts.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Robustness, privacy and adversarial aspects, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 15 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2025.
Builds on
15 of 16 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2024SAFREE: Training-Free and Adaptive Guard for Safe Text-to-Image And Video Generation16 Oct
- 2024Understanding the Impact of Negative Prompts: When and How Do They Take Effect?5 Jun
- 2023One-Dimensional Adapter to Rule Them All: Concepts, Diffusion Models and Erasing Applications26 Dec
- 2023Ring-A-Bell! How Reliable are Concept Removal Methods for Diffusion Models?16 Oct
- 2023Unified Concept Editing in Diffusion Models25 Aug
- 2023Erasing Concepts from Diffusion Models13 Mar
- 2022Safe Latent Diffusion: Mitigating Inappropriate Degeneration in Diffusion Models9 Nov
Other references · 8
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Implicit Modelscited by 9,655
- 2022Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidancecited by 5,717
- 2022An Image is Worth One Word: Personalizing Text-to-Image Generation using Textual Inversioncited by 2,231
- 2022Can Machines Help Us Answering Question 16 in Datasheets, and In Turn Reflecting on Inappropriate Content?cited by 150
- 2023Circumventing Concept Erasure Methods For Text-to-Image Generative Modelscited by 81
- 2024Direct Unlearning Optimization for Robust and Safe Text-to-Image Modelscited by 50
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025PromptGuard: Soft Prompt-Guided Unsafe Content Moderation for Text-to-Image Models
- 2026DTVI: Dual-Stage Textual and Visual Intervention for Safe Text-to-Image Generation
- 2025PromptSafe: Gated Prompt Tuning for Safe Text-to-Image Generation
- 2025Training-Free Safe Text Embedding Guidance for Text-to-Image Diffusion Models
- 2026Disciplined Diffusion: Text-to-Image Diffusion Model against NSFW Generation
- 2024Six-CD: Benchmarking Concept Removals for Benign Text-to-image Diffusion Models
- 2023Prompting4Debugging: Red-Teaming Text-to-Image Diffusion Models by Finding Problematic Prompts
- 2025TRCE: Towards Reliable Malicious Concept Erasure in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models