mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Six-CD: Benchmarking Concept Removals for Benign Text-to-image Diffusion Models

arXiv 2406.14855 ↗First posted 21 Jun 2024cs.CV cs.CRcited by 9

On the map: Diffusion models → Robustness, privacy and adversarial aspects

Abstract (arXiv)

Text-to-image (T2I) diffusion models have shown exceptional capabilities in generating images that closely correspond to textual prompts. However, the advancement of T2I diffusion models presents significant risks, as the models could be exploited for malicious purposes, such as generating images with violence or nudity, or creating unauthorized portraits of public figures in inappropriate contexts. To mitigate these risks, concept removal methods have been proposed. These methods aim to modify diffusion models to prevent the generation of malicious and unwanted concepts. Despite these efforts, existing research faces several challenges: (1) a lack of consistent comparisons on a comprehensive dataset, (2) ineffective prompts in harmful and nudity concepts, (3) overlooked evaluation of the ability to generate the benign part within prompts containing malicious concepts. To address these gaps, we propose to benchmark the concept removal methods by introducing a new dataset, Six-CD, along with a novel evaluation metric. In this benchmark, we conduct a thorough evaluation of concept removals, with the experimental observations and discussions offering valuable insights in the field.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Robustness, privacy and adversarial aspects, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 30 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2024.

Builds on

30 of 45 references.

Closest ancestors · 11

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024MACE: Mass Concept Erasure in Diffusion Models10 Mar
  2. 2023One-Dimensional Adapter to Rule Them All: Concepts, Diffusion Models and Erasing Applications26 Dec
  3. 2023MMA-Diffusion: MultiModal Attack on Diffusion Models29 Nov
  4. 2023Unified Concept Editing in Diffusion Models25 Aug
  5. 2023Towards Safe Self-Distillation of Internet-Scale Text-to-Image Diffusion Models12 Jul
  6. 2023Unsafe Diffusion: On the Generation of Unsafe Images and Hateful Memes From Text-To-Image Models23 May
  7. 2023Forget-Me-Not: Learning to Forget in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models30 Mar
  8. 2023Ablating Concepts in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models23 Mar
  9. 2023Erasing Concepts from Diffusion Models13 Mar
  10. 2022Safe Latent Diffusion: Mitigating Inappropriate Degeneration in Diffusion Models9 Nov
  11. 2022Red-Teaming the Stable Diffusion Safety Filter3 Oct

Other references · 19

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
  4. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
  5. 2020Denoising Diffusion Implicit Modelscited by 9,655
  6. 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 8,964
  7. 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,185
  8. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
  9. 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,539
  10. 2022Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidancecited by 5,717
  11. 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,131
  12. 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,274
7 more
  1. 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,388
  2. 2023PixArt-α: Fast Training of Diffusion Transformer for Photorealistic Text-to-Image Synthesiscited by 854
  3. 2022Diffusion Art or Digital Forgery? Investigating Data Replication in Diffusion Modelscited by 418
  4. 2023Glaze: Protecting Artists from Style Mimicry by Text-to-Image Modelscited by 200
  5. 2024Copyright Protection in Generative AI: A Technical Perspectivecited by 35
  6. 2020Online Forgetting Process for Linear Regression Modelscited by 21
  7. 2024Editing Massive Concepts in Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 4.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Comprehensive Evaluation and Analysis for NSFW Concept Erasure in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models
  2. 2025Comprehensive Assessment and Analysis for NSFW Content Erasure in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models
  3. 2025A Comprehensive Survey on Concept Erasure in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models
  4. 2025TRCE: Towards Reliable Malicious Concept Erasure in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models
  5. 2025CE-SDWV: Effective and Efficient Concept Erasure for Text-to-Image Diffusion Models via a Semantic-Driven Word Vocabulary
  6. 2025Prompt-Based Safety Guidance Is Ineffective for Unlearned Text-to-Image Diffusion Models
  7. 2024Holistic Unlearning Benchmark: A Multi-Faceted Evaluation for Text-to-Image Diffusion Model Unlearning
  8. 2025Concept Corrector: Erase concepts on the fly for text-to-image diffusion models