mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Think as Needed: Geometry-Driven Adaptive Perception for Autonomous Driving

arXiv 2605.10117 ↗First posted 11 May 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Autonomous driving scenes range from empty highways to dense intersections with dozens of interacting road users, yet current 3D detection models apply a fixed computation budget to every frame, wasting resources on simple scenes while lacking capacity for complex ones. Existing approaches compound this problem: Transformer-based interaction models scale quadratically with the number of detected objects, and frame-by-frame processing causes the system to immediately forget objects the moment they become occluded. We propose Enhanced HOPE, an adaptive perception architecture that measures the geometric complexity of each incoming LiDAR frame using an unsupervised statistical estimator and routes it through a shallow or deep processing path accordingly, requiring no manual scene labels. To keep interaction modeling efficient, we replace quadratic pairwise attention with a linear-time subspace-based network that groups nearby objects into clusters and processes them jointly. The computational savings from these two mechanisms free up resources for a persistent temporal memory module that retains previously detected objects and traffic rules across frames, enabling the system to recall occluded objects seconds after they disappear from view. On the nuScenes and CARLA benchmarks, Enhanced HOPE reduces latency by 38% on simple scenes with no accuracy loss, improves mean Average Precision by 2.7 points on rare long-tail scenarios, and tracks objects through occlusions lasting over 5 seconds, where all tested baselines fail.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2026.

Builds on

22 of 24 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2023Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spacescited by 4,718
  3. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,523
  4. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,509
  5. 2019Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Datasetcited by 2,451
  6. 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,449
  7. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
  8. 2018PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 1,715
  9. 2021Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gaugescited by 1,167
  10. 2020Center-based 3D Object Detection and Trackingcited by 1,144
  11. 2022Planning-oriented Autonomous Drivingcited by 1,087
  12. 2023VAD: Vectorized Scene Representation for Efficient Autonomous Drivingcited by 622
10 more
  1. 2017BranchyNet: Fast Inference via Early Exiting from Deep Neural Networkscited by 596
  2. 2018Hypergraph Neural Networkscited by 488
  3. 2022TransFusion: Robust LiDAR-Camera Fusion for 3D Object Detection with Transformerscited by 466
  4. 2021Dynamic Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 408
  5. 2024Titans: Learning to Memorize at Test Timecited by 328
  6. 2019Intrinsic dimension of data representations in deep neural networkscited by 282
  7. 2018Estimating the intrinsic dimension of datasets by a minimal neighborhood informationcited by 250
  8. 2024SparseDrive: End-to-End Autonomous Driving via Sparse Scene Representationcited by 241
  9. 2025Nested Learning: The Illusion of Deep Learning Architecturescited by 72
  10. 2016Building Deep Networks on Grassmann Manifoldscited by 58

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.