Only Train Once: Uncertainty-Aware One-Class Learning for Face Authenticity Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid evolution of generative paradigms has enabled the creation of highly realistic imagery, which escalating the risks of identity fraud and the dissemination of disinformation. Most existing approaches frame face forgery detection as a fully supervised binary classification problem. Consequently, these models typically exhibit significant performance decay when tasked with detecting forgeries from previously unseen generative paradigms. Furthermore, these methods focus exclusively on either DeepFakes or fully synthesized faces, thereby failing to provide a generalized framework for universal face forgery detection. In this paper, we address this challenge by introducing FADNet (Face Authenticity Detector Net), % a self-supervised framework that which reformulates face forgery detection as a one-class classification (OCC) task. By training exclusively on authentic facial data to capture their intrinsic representations, FADNet flags any image whose feature embedding deviates significantly from the learned distribution of real faces as a forgery. The framework incorporates Evidential Deep Learning (EDL) to quantify predictive uncertainty and utilizes a plug-and-play pseudo-forgery image generator (PFIG) to tighten decision boundaries around authentic data. Extensive experimental evaluations on the DF40 and ASFD benchmarks demonstrate that FADNet achieves superior performance and generalization capabilities. Specifically, FADNet substantially outperforms existing state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods, yielding a remarkable average accuracy of 96.63% and an average precision of 98.83%.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2026.
Builds on
23 of 35 references.
References · 23
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,539
- 2022Diffusion Models in Vision: A Surveycited by 1,008
- 2019CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for nowcited by 842
- 2016Improving Variational Inference with Inverse Autoregressive Flowcited by 636
- 2020Leveraging Frequency Analysis for Deep Fake Image Recognitioncited by 501
- 2019Face X-ray for More General Face Forgery Detectioncited by 469
- 2023DIRE for Diffusion-Generated Image Detectioncited by 386
- 2020DeepFakes and Beyond: A Survey of Face Manipulation and Fake Detectioncited by 231
- 2018Talking Face Generation by Adversarially Disentangled Audio-Visual Representationcited by 212
- 2020Media Forensics and DeepFakes: an overviewcited by 208
11 more
- 2024DF40: Toward Next-Generation Deepfake Detectioncited by 126
- 2024Deepfake Generation and Detection: A Benchmark and Surveycited by 66
- 2020Face Forgery Detection by 3D Decompositioncited by 53
- 2022Region-Aware Face Swappingcited by 45
- 2023DPE: Disentanglement of Pose and Expression for General Video Portrait Editingcited by 45
- 2024MoE-FFD: Mixture of Experts for Generalized and Parameter-Efficient Face Forgery Detectioncited by 27
- 2023Deepfakes, Misinformation, and Disinformation in the Era of Frontier AI, Generative AI, and Large AI Modelscited by 20
- 2021A Study of the Human Perception of Synthetic Facescited by 14
- 2024DIP: Diffusion Learning of Inconsistency Pattern for General DeepFake Detectioncited by 6
- 2025Model Discrepancy Learning: Synthetic Faces Detection Based on Multi-Reconstructioncited by 3
- 2026Generalizable and Adaptive Continual Learning Framework for AI-generated Image Detectioncited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.