Practical Scaling Laws: Converting Compute into Performance in a Data-Constrained World
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The scaling laws guiding modern model training were calibrated for a single regime: data-rich, single-epoch pretraining. The dominant such scaling law form, Chinchilla's L = E + A/Nα + B/Dβ, has three structural limitations outside that regime: it diverges as unique data shrinks instead of saturating at the uninformed baseline; it cannot represent overfitting when capacity exceeds the data; and it conflates total examples seen with unique examples available. We propose a closed-form extension, L(N, D, T) = E + (L0 - E),h/(1+h) with h = a/Nα + b/Tβ + c,Nγ/Dδ, that decomposes loss into undercapacity, undertraining, and overfitting terms. It saturates between the irreducible loss E and an uninformed baseline L0 fixed by the loss type, and reduces to Chinchilla in the data-rich, single-epoch limit. We validate it on four multi-epoch experiments spanning four architecture families (MLPs, ResNets, Fourier neural operators, and transformers) across vision, scientific ML, and language domains, and refit it to five published LLM scaling-law grids. Extrapolating to higher compute and larger unique data than seen at fit time, our form achieves state-of-the-art RMSE on every published LLM grid we evaluate and on most cells of our constructed experiments. Once calibrated, the form admits a cost-aware allocation that recovers Chinchilla's optimum when data is free and shifts toward smaller corpora and more epochs as data grows expensive.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 May 2026.
Builds on
44 of 55 references.
References · 44
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
- 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
- 2021Scaling Vision Transformerscited by 993
- 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 919
- 2022Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Modelscited by 755
- 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 667
- 2016Distribution-Free Predictive Inference For Regressioncited by 657
- 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 556
- 2019Benign Overfitting in Linear Regressioncited by 544
32 more
- 2020Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modelingcited by 510
- 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 508
- 2023TinyStories: How Small Can Language Models Be and Still Speak Coherent English?cited by 425
- 2019The generalization error of random features regression: Precise asymptotics and double descent curvecited by 410
- 2022PDEBENCH: An Extensive Benchmark for Scientific Machine Learningcited by 396
- 2023Scaling Data-Constrained Language Modelscited by 391
- 2021Explaining Neural Scaling Lawscited by 353
- 2021Scaling Laws for Transfercited by 265
- 2019A Constructive Prediction of the Generalization Error Across Scalescited by 202
- 2024When Scaling Meets LLM Finetuning: The Effect of Data, Model and Finetuning Methodcited by 201
- 2024Scaling Laws and Compute-Optimal Training Beyond Fixed Training Durationscited by 160
- 2023Beyond Chinchilla-Optimal: Accounting for Inference in Language Model Scaling Lawscited by 155
- 2022Scaling Laws and Interpretability of Learning from Repeated Datacited by 147
- 2022Revisiting Neural Scaling Laws in Language and Visioncited by 129
- 2023Towards Foundation Models for Scientific Machine Learning: Characterizing Scaling and Transfer Behaviorcited by 128
- 2024A Dynamical Model of Neural Scaling Lawscited by 105
- 2024Language models scale reliably with over-training and on downstream taskscited by 105
- 2022Broken Neural Scaling Lawscited by 102
- 2022A Solvable Model of Neural Scaling Lawscited by 101
- 2024Scaling Laws for Precisioncited by 92
- 2024Resolving Discrepancies in Compute-Optimal Scaling of Language Modelscited by 84
- 2024Chinchilla Scaling: A replication attemptcited by 65
- 2024Smaller, Weaker, Yet Better: Training LLM Reasoners via Compute-Optimal Samplingcited by 60
- 2020Early Stopping in Deep Networks: Double Descent and How to Eliminate itcited by 40
- 2024Reconciling Kaplan and Chinchilla Scaling Lawscited by 36
- 2025(Mis)Fitting: A Survey of Scaling Lawscited by 24
- 2024A Hitchhiker's Guide to Scaling Law Estimationcited by 23
- 2024Scaling Laws for Pre-training Agents and World Modelscited by 23
- 2024Neural Scaling Laws Rooted in the Data Distributioncited by 14
- 2025Can Language Models Discover Scaling Laws?cited by 12
- 2025Data Scaling Laws for Radiology Foundation Modelscited by 4
- 2025Reusing Overtrained Language Models Saturates Scalingcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.