mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Beyond Static Bias: Adaptive Multi-Fidelity Bandits with Improving Proxies

arXiv 2605.08558 ↗First posted 8 May 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As an extension of the classical multi-armed bandit problem, multi-fidelity multi-armed bandits (MF-MAB) enable individual arms to be evaluated using diverse feedback sources that vary in both cost and accuracy. Prior stochastic models typically assume fixed low-to-high fidelity discrepancies, whereas modern proxy sources, such as learning-based simulators and Large Language Models (LLMs), can be improved using additional calibration. We investigate adaptive MF-MAB with improving proxy sources, and focus on the canonical two-fidelity case in which the low-fidelity source becomes more informative with repeated use. To capture this dynamic, we introduce a selected-average mismatch bound that converts dynamic low-fidelity observations into improvement-aware confidence bounds for the high-fidelity target. We propose the Threshold-Based Adaptive Continuation Companion (TACC), an optimistic algorithm that uses a bounded continuation rule to decide when low-fidelity sampling remains cost-effective and when to escalate. We prove an instance-dependent regret bound showing that, for detected intermediate arms, adaptive continuation replaces logarithmic high-fidelity confirmation with bounded low-fidelity continuation. Experiments on synthetic bandits and an LLM-as-a-judge policy-evaluation task examine when continuation improves cost-weighted regret.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2026.

Builds on

26 of 42 references.

References · 26

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  3. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
  4. 2016Hyperband: A Novel Bandit-Based Approach to Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 699
  5. 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 681
  6. 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 671
  7. 2018Hypothesis Only Baselines in Natural Language Inferencecited by 295
  8. 2015Multi-armed Bandit Models for the Optimal Design of Clinical Trials: Benefits and Challengescited by 114
  9. 2016Corralling a Band of Bandit Algorithmscited by 100
  10. 2024An Empirical Study of LLM-as-a-Judge for LLM Evaluation: Fine-tuned Judge Model is not a General Substitute for GPT-4cited by 94
  11. 2018Learning to Optimize under Non-Stationaritycited by 85
  12. 2020Model Selection in Contextual Stochastic Bandit Problemscited by 71
14 more
  1. 2017Rotting Banditscited by 57
  2. 2019A Survey on Practical Applications of Multi-Armed and Contextual Banditscited by 45
  3. 2017Parameter-free online learning via model selectioncited by 34
  4. 2016Multi-fidelity Gaussian Process Bandit Optimisationcited by 31
  5. 2016The Multi-fidelity Multi-armed Banditcited by 22
  6. 2022Stochastic Rising Banditscited by 18
  7. 2023Data-Driven Online Model Selection With Regret Guaranteescited by 11
  8. 2024Optimal Multi-Fidelity Best-Arm Identificationcited by 9
  9. 2023Best Arm Identification for Stochastic Rising Banditscited by 6
  10. 2023Multi-Fidelity Multi-Armed Bandits Revisitedcited by 6
  11. 2025Put CASH on Bandits: A Max K-Armed Problem for Automated Machine Learningcited by 4
  12. 2014Functional Banditscited by 3
  13. 2025Functional multi-armed bandit and the best function identification problemscited by 2
  14. 2025Managing Self-Learning Experts under Per-Round Budget Constraintscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.