Quantile-Coupled Flow Matching for Distributional Reinforcement Learning
On the map: Diffusion models → Diffusion and flow policies for robotics
Abstract (arXiv)
Unlike standard expected-return Reinforcement Learning (RL), Distributional RL (DRL) models the full return distribution, making it better-suited for uncertainty-aware and risk-sensitive decision-making. Conditional Flow Matching (CFM) critics have recently attracted attention for modelling continuous, multi-modal return distributions. Despite this interest, there remains a substantial metric mismatch: DRL theory relies on the distributional Bellman operator being contractive in the p-Wasserstein distance, yet existing CFM critics are trained with arbitrary source-target couplings, so their flow-matching losses are not Wasserstein-aligned surrogates for matching Bellman target return distributions. In this work, we address this mismatch by proposing FlowIQN, a CFM critic that sorts source and Bellman target samples within each mini-batch to approximate the monotone optimal transport coupling, replacing arbitrary pairings with quantile-aligned flow paths. We prove that the loss of our quantile-coupled CFM critic yields a Wasserstein-aligned approximate projection compatible with the foundations of DRL. To our knowledge, FlowIQN is the first flow-matching distributional critic with an explicit Wasserstein-aligned projection guarantee. We further extend FlowIQN with shortcut models for efficient inference. Empirical results show that FlowIQN improves Wasserstein return-distribution accuracy over other CFM critics. It also yields competitive performance on offline RL benchmarks across multiple policy extraction methods, providing a theoretically grounded CFM critic that is readily compatible with DRL pipelines. Code: https://github.com/ori-goals/flowIQN.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion and flow policies for robotics, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 27 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2026.
Builds on
27 of 32 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2026What Does Flow Matching Bring To TD Learning?4 Mar
- 2025FlowCritic: Bridging Value Estimation with Flow Matching in Reinforcement Learning26 Oct
- 2025Expressive Value Learning for Scalable Offline Reinforcement Learning9 Oct
- 2025floq: Training Critics via Flow-Matching for Scaling Compute in Value-Based RL8 Sep
- 2025Flow Q-Learning4 Feb
Other references · 22
- 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,426
- 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flowcited by 3,550
- 2020Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problemscited by 1,873
- 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,777
- 2018Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning without Explorationcited by 1,227
- 2023Stochastic Interpolants: A Unifying Framework for Flows and Diffusionscited by 897
- 2023Improving and generalizing flow-based generative models with minibatch optimal transportcited by 835
- 2017A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 743
- 2017Distributional Reinforcement Learning with Quantile Regressioncited by 464
- 2024One Step Diffusion via Shortcut Modelscited by 373
- 2018Implicit Quantile Networks for Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 362
- 2024Flow Matching Guide and Codecited by 291
10 more
- 2024OGBench: Benchmarking Offline Goal-Conditioned RLcited by 216
- 2021Conservative Offline Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 78
- 2019Distributional Reinforcement Learning for Efficient Explorationcited by 59
- 20251000 Layer Networks for Self-Supervised RL: Scaling Depth Can Enable New Goal-Reaching Capabilitiescited by 39
- 2023The Benefits of Being Distributional: Small-Loss Bounds for Reinforcement Learningcited by 27
- 2024More Benefits of Being Distributional: Second-Order Bounds for Reinforcement Learningcited by 23
- 2024Theoretical guarantees in KL for Diffusion Flow Matchingcited by 14
- 2025Value Flowscited by 12
- 2025Unleashing Flow Policies with Distributional Criticscited by 7
- 2026Formalizing the Sampling Design Space of Diffusion-Based Generative Models via Adaptive Solvers and Wasserstein-Bounded Timestepscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Path-Coupled Bellman Flows for Distributional Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Refinement-based Flow Policy Optimization
- 2026Reverse Flow Matching: A Unified Framework for Online Reinforcement Learning with Diffusion and Flow Policies
- 2026One-Sided Quantile Coupling for Flow Matching
- 2026Reinforcement Learning for Flow-Matching Policies with Density Transport
- 2026Flow Matching for Offline Reinforcement Learning with Discrete Actions
- 2026Flow-based Policy With Distributional Reinforcement Learning in Trajectory Optimization
- 2023A Coupled Flow Approach to Imitation Learning