LLMSYS-HPOBench: Hyperparameter Optimization Benchmark Suite for Real-World LLM Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Model (LLM) systems have been the frontier of AI in many application domains, leading to new challenges and opportunities for hyperparameter optimization (HPO) for the AutoML community. However, this type of system exhibits an unprecedented compound space of hyperparameter configuration from both the AI and non-AI components; rich and nonlinear implications from the fidelity factors; and diverse costs of measuring hyperparameter configurations, none of which have been fully captured in existing benchmarks. This paper presents the first (live) benchmark suite and datasets for HPO of real-world LLM systems, dubbed LLMSYS-HPOBench, covering data related to the inference objective values of hyperparameter configurations profiled from running the LLM systems. Currently, LLMSYS-HPOBench contains 364,450 hyperparameter configurations with a dimensionality of 12-23, 3-5 dimensions of fidelity factor leading to 932 settings, 3-9 inference objective metrics, and 2-10 cost metrics, together with generated logs from measuring the LLM systems. What we seek to advocate is not only a revalidation of the existing HPO algorithms over the frontier LLM systems, but also to provide an evolving platform for the AutoML community to explore new directions of research in this regard. The benchmark suite has been made available at: https://github.com/ideas-labo/llmsys-hpobench
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2026.
Builds on
47 of 69 references.
References · 47
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
- 2016Hyperband: A Novel Bandit-Based Approach to Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 699
- 2018BOHB: Robust and Efficient Hyperparameter Optimization at Scalecited by 470
- 2020NAS-Bench-201: Extending the Scope of Reproducible Neural Architecture Searchcited by 416
- 2019NAS-Bench-101: Towards Reproducible Neural Architecture Searchcited by 344
- 2020ProofWriter: Generating Implications, Proofs, and Abductive Statements over Natural Languagecited by 324
- 2024LightRAG: Simple and Fast Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 315
- 2016Fast Bayesian Optimization of Machine Learning Hyperparameters on Large Datasetscited by 132
- 2024Vidur: A Large-Scale Simulation Framework For LLM Inferencecited by 117
- 2021HPOBench: A Collection of Reproducible Multi-Fidelity Benchmark Problems for HPOcited by 112
- 2024Large Language Models as Urban Residents: An LLM Agent Framework for Personal Mobility Generationcited by 100
- 2020HEBO Pushing The Limits of Sample-Efficient Hyperparameter Optimisationcited by 83
35 more
- 2021HPO-B: A Large-Scale Reproducible Benchmark for Black-Box HPO based on OpenMLcited by 75
- 2020Surrogate NAS Benchmarks: Going Beyond the Limited Search Spaces of Tabular NAS Benchmarkscited by 67
- 2021YAHPO Gym -- An Efficient Multi-Objective Multi-Fidelity Benchmark for Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 62
- 2022AMLB: an AutoML Benchmarkcited by 55
- 2025The Cost of Dynamic Reasoning: Demystifying AI Agents and Test-Time Scaling from an AI Infrastructure Perspectivecited by 39
- 2024HtmlRAG: HTML is Better Than Plain Text for Modeling Retrieved Knowledge in RAG Systemscited by 37
- 2022NAS-Bench-Suite: NAS Evaluation is (Now) Surprisingly Easycited by 36
- 2025EoH-S: Evolution of Heuristic Set using LLMs for Automated Heuristic Designcited by 36
- 2018Finding Faster Configurations using FLASHcited by 32
- 2021Multi-Objectivizing Software Configuration Tuning (for a single performance concern)cited by 28
- 2017BestConfig: Tapping the Performance Potential of Systems via Automatic Configuration Tuningcited by 25
- 2023Do Performance Aspirations Matter for Guiding Software Configuration Tuning?cited by 21
- 2021MMO: Meta Multi-Objectivization for Software Configuration Tuningcited by 20
- 2020How to Evaluate Solutions in Pareto-based Search-Based Software Engineering? A Critical Review and Methodological Guidancecited by 17
- 2024Predicting Configuration Performance in Multiple Environments with Sequential Meta-learningcited by 17
- 2023Predicting Software Performance with Divide-and-Learncited by 16
- 2024On Speeding Up Language Model Evaluationcited by 15
- 2024Adapting Multi-objectivized Software Configuration Tuningcited by 13
- 2025Distilled Lifelong Self-Adaptation for Configurable Systemscited by 12
- 2025Faster, Cheaper, Better: Multi-Objective Hyperparameter Optimization for LLM and RAG Systemscited by 12
- 2025PromiseTune: Unveiling Causally Promising and Explainable Configuration Tuningcited by 12
- 2025Accuracy Can Lie: On the Impact of Surrogate Model in Configuration Tuningcited by 10
- 2025Dually Hierarchical Drift Adaptation for Online Configuration Performance Learningcited by 8
- 2019Whence to Learn? Transferring Knowledge in Configurable Systems using BEETLEcited by 6
- 2021The Interaction between Inputs and Configurations fed to Software Systems: an Empirical Studycited by 6
- 2025FinRpt: Dataset, Evaluation System and LLM-based Multi-agent Framework for Equity Research Report Generationcited by 6
- 2026Revealing Domain-Spatiality Patterns for Configuration Tuning: Domain Knowledge Meets Fitness Landscapescited by 5
- 2023CM-CASL: Comparison-based Performance Modeling of Software Systems via Collaborative Active and Semisupervised Learningcited by 4
- 2024Dividable Configuration Performance Learningcited by 4
- 2025Evolving Excellence: Automated Optimization of LLM-based Agentscited by 4
- 2024CATBench: A Compiler Autotuning Benchmarking Suite for Black-box Optimizationcited by 2
- 2025CoTune: Co-evolutionary Configuration Tuningcited by 2
- 2025Light over Heavy: Automated Performance Requirements Quantification with Linguistic Inducementcited by 2
- 2025MOOT: a Repository of Many Multi-Objective Optimization Taskscited by 2
- 2026Conjecture and Inquiry: Quantifying Software Performance Requirements via Interactive Retrieval-Augmented Preference Elicitationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.