mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

What Cohort INRs Encode and Where to Freeze Them

arXiv 2605.08298 ↗First posted 8 May 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reusing the early layers of cohort-trained INRs as initialization for new signals has been shown to accelerate and improve signal fitting, yet it remains unclear which layers of the shared encoder learn transferable representations and what those representations encode. We address both questions for two standard backbones, SIREN and Fourier-feature MLPs (FFMLP). First, sweeping the freeze depth across the shared encoder at test time, we find that the optimum coincides with the layer of highest weight stable rank. Moreover, freezing at this depth matches or improves on the standard fine-tuning recipe across all our experiments. Second, identifying which layer transfers does not characterize what that layer encodes. To address this we adopt sparse autoencoders (SAEs), the dominant tool in mechanistic interpretability, and present the first SAE decomposition of INR activations into sparse dictionary atoms. Interestingly, SIREN and FFMLP achieve comparable cohort-fitting quality, but learn qualitatively different dictionaries. Cohort SIREN's atoms are localized, tiling the coordinate plane such that each atom fires in a confined region independent of cohort content. Cohort FFMLP's atoms are image-spanning, tracing the contours of memorized cohort signals. Single-atom ablations confirm causal use of these dictionaries: a single FFMLP atom out of 4096 can drop PSNR by up to 10.6 dB across the image, while SIREN ablations remain confined to where the atom fires. Together, these results give the first mechanistic account of what transfers in cohort-trained INRs and turn their activations into inspectable dictionary atoms. These tools open a path towards characterizing what INRs encode and towards architectures designed for generalization rather than memorization.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 57 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2026.

Builds on

57 of 72 references.

References · 57

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  4. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
  5. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  6. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  7. 2022Instant Neural Graphics Primitives with a Multiresolution Hash Encodingcited by 3,723
  8. 2017Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variationcited by 2,988
  9. 2019DeepSDF: Learning Continuous Signed Distance Functions for Shape Representationcited by 2,689
  10. 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,238
  11. 2020Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domainscited by 2,200
  12. 2021Mip-NeRF: A Multiscale Representation for Anti-Aliasing Neural Radiance Fieldscited by 1,964
38 more
  1. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
  2. 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,341
  3. 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,225
  4. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
  5. 2020Implicit Geometric Regularization for Learning Shapescited by 710
  6. 2024Representation Alignment for Generation: Training Diffusion Transformers Is Easier Than You Thinkcited by 703
  7. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
  8. 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 435
  9. 2013DeCAF: A Deep Convolutional Activation Feature for Generic Visual Recognitioncited by 424
  10. 2025Perception Encoder: The best visual embeddings are not at the output of the networkcited by 326
  11. 2021NeRV: Neural Representations for Videoscited by 256
  12. 2020Learned Initializations for Optimizing Coordinate-Based Neural Representationscited by 242
  13. 2021COIN: COmpression with Implicit Neural representationscited by 233
  14. 2023WIRE: Wavelet Implicit Neural Representationscited by 220
  15. 2013k-Sparse Autoencoderscited by 215
  16. 2020MetaSDF: Meta-learning Signed Distance Functionscited by 214
  17. 2022From data to functa: Your data point is a function and you can treat it like onecited by 187
  18. 2021Implicit Neural Representations for Image Compressioncited by 162
  19. 2021NeRP: Implicit Neural Representation Learning with Prior Embedding for Sparsely Sampled Image Reconstructioncited by 146
  20. 2020Frequency Bias in Neural Networks for Input of Non-Uniform Densitycited by 140
  21. 2021Modulated Periodic Activations for Generalizable Local Functional Representationscited by 140
  22. 2021Beyond Periodicity: Towards a Unifying Framework for Activations in Coordinate-MLPscited by 135
  23. 2024Scalable Pre-training of Large Autoregressive Image Modelscited by 115
  24. 2022VideoINR: Learning Video Implicit Neural Representation for Continuous Space-Time Super-Resolutioncited by 101
  25. 2021A Structured Dictionary Perspective on Implicit Neural Representationscited by 100
  26. 2022Transformers as Meta-Learners for Implicit Neural Representationscited by 79
  27. 2023FINER: Flexible spectral-bias tuning in Implicit NEural Representation by Variable-periodic Activation Functionscited by 78
  28. 2021Implicit Neural Video Compressioncited by 52
  29. 2022NIRVANA: Neural Implicit Representations of Videos with Adaptive Networks and Autoregressive Patch-wise Modelingcited by 51
  30. 2021Seeing Implicit Neural Representations as Fourier Seriescited by 50
  31. 2021Meta-Learning Sparse Implicit Neural Representationscited by 48
  32. 2022Generalizable Implicit Neural Representations via Instance Pattern Composerscited by 39
  33. 2024The Missing Curve Detectors of InceptionV1: Applying Sparse Autoencoders to InceptionV1 Early Visioncited by 37
  34. 2022Learning the Effect of Registration Hyperparameters with HyperMorphcited by 35
  35. 2023Single-subject Multi-contrast MRI Super-resolution via Implicit Neural Representationscited by 32
  36. 2023SplineCam: Exact Visualization and Characterization of Deep Network Geometry and Decision Boundariescited by 31
  37. 2023NISF: Neural Implicit Segmentation Functionscited by 29
  38. 2025An Empirical Study of Autoregressive Pre-training from Videoscited by 21

50 most cited of 57 All 57 (JSON)

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026A Dominant Diffuse Phase in the Sparse Autoencoder Phase Diagram
  2. 2026Size Doesn't Matter: Cosine-Scored Sparse Autoencoders
  3. 2026Where Decoder Cosine Similarity Fails for SAE Feature Flow Discovery
  4. 2026From Geometric Recovery to Causal Validation: A Reproducible Audit of Sparse Autoencoder Features, from Superposition Geometry to Causal Inertness
  5. 2026Improving Robustness In Sparse Autoencoders via Masked Regularization
  6. 2026Inference and learning in sparse autoencoders as natural gradient flow
  7. 2026Diminishing Returns of Data in Sparse Autoencoders: Functional Behavior does not Guarantee Feature Reproducibility
  8. 2026When Pruning Meets Interpretability: Preserving Sparse Autoencoder Robustness in LLMs