Inference and learning in sparse autoencoders as natural gradient flow
On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Sparse autoencoders are widely used to uncover interpretable features in neural networks, yet reliable recovery remains difficult when features overlap or activate infrequently. These challenges involve both inferring which features explain an input and learning the dictionary that represents them. Here, we unify inference and dictionary learning as natural-gradient flows on a shared variational free energy. We instantiate this framework as BeFOND, an encoder-free sparse coding model with closed-form inference and learning dynamics. We show how recurrent explaining away reduces interference between overlapping features, while Fisher preconditioning can compensate for the slow learning of rare features. On synthetic data, BeFOND improves dictionary recovery and rare-feature detection, with a growing advantage over amortized baselines as superposition increases. On language-model activations, it improves single-feature concept detection and selective intervention, outperforming pretrained reference SAEs with substantially less training data. Its feature quality continues to improve with dictionary width, whereas the evaluated baselines largely plateau. Together, these results show how improving inference and learning within a unified probabilistic framework can make better use of data and dictionary capacity to interpret and intervene on neural representations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 9 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2026.
Builds on
9 of 80 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Stop Probing, Start Coding: Why Linear Probes and Sparse Autoencoders Fail at Compositional Generalisation30 Mar
- 2026SynthSAEBench: Evaluating Sparse Autoencoders on Scalable Realistic Synthetic Data16 Feb
Other references · 7
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 4,053
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
- 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoderscited by 300
- 2013k-Sparse Autoencoderscited by 215
- 2024BatchTopK Sparse Autoencoderscited by 130
- 2026The information geometry of large language models is shared, learned, and controllablecited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Compute Optimal Inference and Provable Amortisation Gap in Sparse Autoencoders
- 2024Features that Make a Difference: Leveraging Gradients for Improved Dictionary Learning
- 2026Toward Identifiable Sparse Autoencoders
- 2025Learning Multi-Level Features with Matryoshka Sparse Autoencoders
- 2026Expander Sparse Autoencoders: Parameter-Efficient Dictionaries for Mechanistic Interpretability
- 2025A Unified Theory of Sparse Dictionary Learning in Mechanistic Interpretability: Piecewise Biconvexity and Spurious Minima
- 2026A Dominant Diffuse Phase in the Sparse Autoencoder Phase Diagram
- 2025Empirical Evaluation of Progressive Coding for Sparse Autoencoders