mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Forecasting Source Stability in Scientific Experiments using Temporal Learning Models: A Case Study from Tritium Monitoring

arXiv 2605.08140 ↗First posted 2 May 2026physics.ins-det cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Karlsruhe Tritium Neutrino Experiment (KATRIN) aims to measure the absolute neutrino mass with unprecedented sensitivity, requiring precise monitoring of the windowless gaseous tritium source, where tritium beta decay occurs. To track variations of the source activity, beta-induced X-ray spectroscopy provides real-time diagnostics. However, traditional drift detection methods struggle with the infrequent and transient nature of instability events in gaseous tritium. This study bridges the gap between state-of-the-art time-series forecasting models and real-world experimental applications by leveraging deep learning to predict the time to stability after instabilities. Unlike standard benchmarking approaches that emphasize algorithmic performance on fixed datasets, we apply forecasting models -- including LSTM, N-BEATS, TFT, NHITS, DLinear, NLinear, TSMixer, and Chronos-LLM -- to complex, large-scale experimental data. Our findings highlight two challenges: learning from sparse instability events and forecasting long time horizons (i.e., predicting hundreds of future points), both of which are ongoing challenges in time-series forecasting and remain active areas of research. This prediction task has direct experimental value by enabling better scheduling and maintenance planning. A reliable forecast of stability time allows for more efficient measurement and task management during stabilization periods. Through model selection, we identified N-BEATS as the top performer, excelling in accuracy and repeatability, demonstrating that deep learning can optimize large-scale physics experiments.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 May 2026.

Builds on

15 of 31 references.

References · 15

  1. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
  2. 2022Are Transformers Effective for Time Series Forecasting?cited by 1,424
  3. 2019Temporal Fusion Transformers for Interpretable Multi-horizon Time Series Forecastingcited by 761
  4. 2024Chronos: Learning the Language of Time Seriescited by 759
  5. 2019N-BEATS: Neural basis expansion analysis for interpretable time series forecastingcited by 753
  6. 2023Time-LLM: Time Series Forecasting by Reprogramming Large Language Modelscited by 700
  7. 2023One Fits All:Power General Time Series Analysis by Pretrained LMcited by 632
  8. 2023Large Language Models Are Zero-Shot Time Series Forecasterscited by 500
  9. 2023TSMixer: An All-MLP Architecture for Time Series Forecastingcited by 240
  10. 2022PromptCast: A New Prompt-based Learning Paradigm for Time Series Forecastingcited by 172
  11. 2022N-HiTS: Neural Hierarchical Interpolation for Time Series Forecastingcited by 146
  12. 2021Darts: User-Friendly Modern Machine Learning for Time Seriescited by 91
3 more
  1. 2018Forecasting Economics and Financial Time Series: ARIMA vs. LSTMcited by 33
  2. 2024A Survey of Deep Learning and Foundation Models for Time Series Forecastingcited by 33
  3. 2024BORA: A Personalized Data Display for Large-scale Experimentscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.