mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Black-box model classification under the discriminative factorization

arXiv 2605.07878 ↗First posted 8 May 2026cs.LG stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Access to modern generative systems is often restricted to querying an API (the ``black-box" setting) and many properties of the system are unknown to the user at inference time. While recent work has shown that low-dimensional representations of models based on the relationship between their embedded responses to a set of queries are useful for inferring model-level properties, the quality of these representations is highly sensitive to the query set. We introduce the discriminative factorization to distinguish between high- and low-quality query sets in the context of black-box model-level classification. Under this framework, the probability of chance-level classification decays exponentially in the query budget. On three auditing tasks, estimated factorization parameters predict the empirical performance decay rate. We conclude by showing that query sets selected using the estimated discriminative field reproduce the empirical ordering of oracle query sets.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2026.

Builds on

23 of 39 references.

References · 23

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  3. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  4. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
  5. 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,109
  6. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
  7. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
  8. 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,212
  9. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
  10. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
  11. 2020Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 671
  12. 2024A Systematic Survey of Prompt Engineering in Large Language Models: Techniques and Applicationscited by 431
11 more
  1. 2023Detecting Pretraining Data from Large Language Modelscited by 387
  2. 2024The Platonic Representation Hypothesiscited by 382
  3. 2024Nomic Embed: Training a Reproducible Long Context Text Embeddercited by 265
  4. 2024Do Membership Inference Attacks Work on Large Language Models?cited by 195
  5. 2024LLM Dataset Inference: Did you train on my dataset?cited by 110
  6. 2025The Universal Weight Subspace Hypothesiscited by 24
  7. 2023Comparing Foundation Models using Data Kernelscited by 14
  8. 2024Tracking the perspectives of interacting language modelscited by 14
  9. 2024Consistent estimation of generative model representations in the data kernel perspective spacecited by 10
  10. 2024Statistical inference on black-box generative models in the data kernel perspective spacecited by 9
  11. 2022Mental State Classification Using Multi-graph Featurescited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.