APEX: Assumption-free Projection-based Embedding eXamination Metric for Image Quality Assessment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As generative models achieve unprecedented visual quality, the gold standard for image evaluation remains traditional feature-distribution metrics (e.g., FID). However, these metrics are provably hindered by the closed-vocabulary bottleneck of outdated features and the assumptive bias of rigid parametric formulations. Recent alternatives exploit modern backbones to solve the feature bottleneck, yet continue to suffer from parametric limitations. To close this gap, we introduce APEX (Assumption-free Projection-based Embedding eXamination), a novel evaluation framework leveraging the Sliced Wasserstein Distance as a mathematically grounded, assumption-free similarity measure. APEX inherits effective scalability to high-dimensional spaces, as we prove with theoretical and empirical evidences. Moreover, APEX is embedding-agnostic and uses two open-vocabulary foundation models, CLIP and DINOv2, as feature extractors. Benchmarking APEX against established baselines reveals superior robustness to visual degradations. Additionally, we show that APEX metrics exhibit intra- and cross-dataset stability, ensuring highly stable evaluations on out-of-domain datasets.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2026.
Builds on
23 of 38 references.
References · 23
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 8,964
- 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,185
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2015Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamicscited by 7,005
- 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,539
- 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,986
- 2022Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformerscited by 5,931
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
11 more
- 2019Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distributioncited by 4,067
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
- 2017Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variationcited by 2,967
- 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,938
- 2018Demystifying MMD GANscited by 1,268
- 2022Diffusion Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,107
- 2017ChestX-ray8: Hospital-scale Chest X-ray Database and Benchmarks on Weakly-Supervised Classification and Localization of Common Thorax Diseasescited by 969
- 2015A note on the evaluation of generative modelscited by 291
- 2023Exposing flaws of generative model evaluation metrics and their unfair treatment of diffusion modelscited by 199
- 2024A Practical Guide to Sample-based Statistical Distances for Evaluating Generative Models in Sciencecited by 14
- 2023Fr'echet Wavelet Distance: A Domain-Agnostic Metric for Image Generationcited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.