mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Kurtosis-Guided Denoising Score Matching for Tabular Anomaly Detection

arXiv 2605.06955 ↗First posted 7 May 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Denoising score matching (DSM) provides a way to learn data distributions by training a neural network to recover the score function, defined as the gradient of the log density, from noise-corrupted samples. Once trained, the score magnitude at a test point reflects how consistent that point is with the learned distribution, making it a natural anomaly signal. The key practical challenge is selecting the perturbation scale: too little noise yields unstable score estimates in sparse regions, while too much erases local structure and weakens anomaly sensitivity. This is compounded by the difficulty of hyperparameter tuning when anomalies are unknown and no validation set is available. We introduce kurtosis-based noise scaling (K-DSM), a per-feature scheme that sets noise levels from the shape of each marginal distribution, improving coverage of low-density regions and precision in high-density regions without extra model complexity. Contrary to prior claims that multi-scale or noise-conditioned training is necessary, we find that a carefully trained single-scale model is already a strong anomaly detector. On standard tabular anomaly detection benchmarks, K-DSM achieves state-of-the-art performance in the semi-supervised setting. When combined with a lightweight EMA-teacher filtering rule that removes low-density training points before each gradient step, it also achieves strong performance in the fully unsupervised (contaminated) setting, suggesting that simple, data-adaptive noise scaling enables robust anomaly detection while reducing reliance on hyperparameter tuning.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2026.

Builds on

23 of 54 references.

References · 23

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
  2. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  3. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  4. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  5. 2019Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distributioncited by 4,101
  6. 2016Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,057
  7. 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 740
  8. 2022SPot-the-Difference Self-Supervised Pre-training for Anomaly Detection and Segmentationcited by 400
  9. 2022ADBench: Anomaly Detection Benchmarkcited by 232
  10. 2020Classification-Based Anomaly Detection for General Datacited by 211
  11. 2022ECOD: Unsupervised Outlier Detection Using Empirical Cumulative Distribution Functionscited by 153
  12. 2020COPOD: Copula-Based Outlier Detectioncited by 146
11 more
  1. 2021Neural Transformation Learning for Deep Anomaly Detection Beyond Imagescited by 99
  2. 2023On Diffusion Modeling for Anomaly Detectioncited by 72
  3. 2024A Closer Look at AUROC and AUPRC under Class Imbalancecited by 57
  4. 2022A Survey on Explainable Anomaly Detectioncited by 39
  5. 2020Multiscale Score Matching for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 36
  6. 2023Fascinating Supervisory Signals and Where to Find Them: Deep Anomaly Detection with Scale Learningcited by 25
  7. 2017Minimum Covariance Determinant and Extensionscited by 20
  8. 2020AutoAudit: Mining Accounting and Time-Evolving Graphscited by 15
  9. 2018Semi-supervised Rare Disease Detection Using Generative Adversarial Networkcited by 4
  10. 2025Diffusion-Scheduled Denoising Autoencoders for Anomaly Detection in Tabular Datacited by 4
  11. 2017Fault Detection of Broken Rotor Bar in LS-PMSM Using Random Forestscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.