mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Parser agreement and disagreement in L2 Korean UD: Implications for human-in-the-loop annotation

arXiv 2605.06625 ↗First posted 7 May 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a simplified human-in-the-loop workflow for second language (L2) Korean morphosyntactic annotation by leveraging agreement between two domain-adapted parsers. We first evaluate whether parser agreement can serve as a proxy for annotation correctness by comparing it with independent human judgments. The results show strong correspondence between parser and human judgments, supporting the feasibility of semi-automatic L2-Korean UD annotation. Further analysis demonstrates that parser disagreements cluster in linguistically predictable domains such as grammatical-relation distinctions and clause-boundary ambiguity. While many disagreement cases are tractable for iterative model refinement, others reflect deeper representational challenges inherent in parsing and tagging L2-Korean corpora.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2026.

Builds on

6 of 38 references.

References · 6

  1. 2020Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languagescited by 723
  2. 2021Trankit: A Light-Weight Transformer-based Toolkit for Multilingual Natural Language Processingcited by 68
  3. 2016What to do about non-standard (or non-canonical) language in NLPcited by 35
  4. 2016Universal Dependencies for Learner Englishcited by 11
  5. 2025Second language Korean Universal Dependency treebank v1.2: Focus on data augmentation and annotation scheme refinementcited by 3
  6. 2025UD-KSL Treebank v1.3: A semi-automated framework for aligning XPOS-extracted units with UPOS tagscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.