A Regime Theory of Controller Class Selection for LLM Action Decisions
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Embodied and 3D vision-language models
Abstract (arXiv)
Deployed language and vision-language models must decide, on each input, whether to answer directly, retrieve evidence, defer to a stronger model, or abstain. Contrary to the common monotonicity intuition, greater per-input expressivity is not uniformly beneficial in finite samples: under identical strict cross-validation, different benchmarks prefer different controller classes. This reflects a finite-sample limitation of instance-level uncertainty signals, which can be exhausted at a distribution-dependent scale. We organize controllers into a nested lattice of four classes: fixed actions, partition routers, instance-level controllers, and prior-gated controllers, ordered by complexity. We prove a regime theory that turns three data-estimable bottlenecks into a class choice: how much improvement is possible beyond the best fixed action, whether there are enough samples for instance-level controllers to make reliable decisions, and how much improvement a coarse partition router can recover when instance-level signal is unreliable. The resulting Bernstein-tight threshold has a matching information-theoretic lower bound, and strict nested cross-validation provably selects a near-best class. Across SMS-Spam, HallusionBench, A-OKVQA, and FOLIO, the predicted class matches the empirical winner; the prior-gated controller wins on TextVQA when OCR tokens supply a label-free prediction-time prior. Code is available at https://github.com/Anonymous-Awesome-Submissions/Regime-Theory.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Embodied and 3D vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 28 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2026.
Builds on
28 of 43 references.
References · 28
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
- 2023InternVL: Scaling up Vision Foundation Models and Aligning for Generic Visual-Linguistic Taskscited by 2,565
- 2023Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflectioncited by 1,839
- 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,718
- 2022Atlas: Few-shot Learning with Retrieval Augmented Language Modelscited by 952
- 2023FrugalGPT: How to Use Large Language Models While Reducing Cost and Improving Performancecited by 853
- 2017Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networkscited by 852
- 2022A-OKVQA: A Benchmark for Visual Question Answering using World Knowledgecited by 710
- 2023Mitigating Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models through Visual Contrastive Decodingcited by 688
- 2024RouteLLM: Learning to Route LLMs with Preference Datacited by 682
- 2023HallusionBench: An Advanced Diagnostic Suite for Entangled Language Hallucination and Visual Illusion in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 583
16 more
- 2024Adaptive-RAG: Learning to Adapt Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models through Question Complexitycited by 451
- 2024Hybrid LLM: Cost-Efficient and Quality-Aware Query Routingcited by 372
- 2021Distribution-Free, Risk-Controlling Prediction Setscited by 288
- 2020Consistent Estimators for Learning to Defer to an Expertcited by 271
- 2022FOLIO: Natural Language Reasoning with First-Order Logiccited by 235
- 2023Calibrated Language Models Must Hallucinatecited by 115
- 2024RouterDC: Query-Based Router by Dual Contrastive Learning for Assembling Large Language Modelscited by 88
- 2024A Unified Approach to Routing and Cascading for LLMscited by 80
- 2021Optimal strategies for reject option classifierscited by 61
- 2022Learning to Defer to Multiple Experts: Consistent Surrogate Losses, Confidence Calibration, and Conformal Ensemblescited by 60
- 2023When Does Confidence-Based Cascade Deferral Suffice?cited by 60
- 2024Selective "Selective Prediction": Reducing Unnecessary Abstention in Vision-Language Reasoningcited by 40
- 2024Overcoming Common Flaws in the Evaluation of Selective Classification Systemscited by 37
- 2025(Im)possibility of Automated Hallucination Detection in Large Language Modelscited by 15
- 2022AUC-based Selective Classificationcited by 13
- 2024Hierarchical Selective Classificationcited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Verifier-free Test-Time Sampling for Vision-Language-Action Models
- 2026Training Language Models to Cooperate with Inference-Time Controllers
- 2026Dynamic Model Routing and Cascading for Efficient LLM Inference: A Survey
- 2026REFLEX with Jev for Efficient Selective Control in LLM Agents
- 2026Learning to Control LLM Agent Harnesses with Offline Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Recovering General Capabilities via Uncertainty-Calibrated Multi-Teacher On-Policy Distillation
- 2025Learning to Route LLMs from Bandit Feedback: One Policy, Many Trade-offs
- 2026Sparsity Is Necessary: Polynomial-Time Stability for Agentic LLMs in Large Action Spaces