mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

The autoPET3 Challenge: Automated Lesion Segmentation in Whole-Body PET/CT unicodex2013 Multitracer Multicenter Generalization

arXiv 2605.05775 ↗First posted 7 May 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We report the design and results of the third autoPET challenge (MICCAI 2024), which benchmarked automated lesion segmentation in whole-body PET/CT under a compositional generalization setting. Training data comprised 1,014 [18F]-FDG PET/CT studies from the University Hospital T"ubingen and 597 [18F]/[68Ga]-PSMA PET/CT studies from the LMU University Hospital Munich, constituting the largest publicly available annotated PSMA PET/CT dataset to date. The held-out test set of 200 studies covered four tracer-center combinations, two of which represented unseen compositional pairings. A complementary data-centric award category isolated the contribution of data handling strategies by restricting participants to a fixed baseline model. Seventeen teams submitted 27 algorithms, predominantly nnU-Net-based 3D networks with PET/CT channel concatenation. The top-ranked algorithm achieved a mean DSC of 0.66, FNV of 3.18 mL, and FPV of 2.78 mL across all four test conditions, improving DSC by 8% and reducing the false-negative volume by 5 mL relative to the provided baseline. Ranking was stable across bootstrap resampling and alternative ranking schemes for the top tier. Beyond the benchmark, we provide an in-depth analysis of segmentation performance at the patient and lesion level. Three main conclusions can be drawn: (1) in-domain multitracer PET/CT segmentation is sufficient and probably approaching reader agreement; (2) compositional generalization to unseen tracer-center combinations remains an open problem mainly driven by systematic volume overestimation; (3) heterogeneity and case difficulty drive performance variation substantially more than the choice of algorithm among top-ranked teams.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2026.

Builds on

13 of 59 references.

References · 13

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,950
  2. 2018Panoptic Segmentationcited by 798
  3. 2023DataComp: In search of the next generation of multimodal datasetscited by 639
  4. 20183D MRI brain tumor segmentation using autoencoder regularizationcited by 325
  5. 2024nnU-Net Revisited: A Call for Rigorous Validation in 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 237
  6. 2020nnU-Net for Brain Tumor Segmentationcited by 103
  7. 2024Towards Generalizable Tumor Synthesiscited by 65
  8. 2019Methods and open-source toolkit for analyzing and visualizing challenge resultscited by 60
  9. 2023MultiTalent: A Multi-Dataset Approach to Medical Image Segmentationcited by 45
  10. 2024From FDG to PSMA: A Hitchhiker's Guide to Multitracer, Multicenter Lesion Segmentation in PET/CT Imagingcited by 16
  11. 2024Every Component Counts: Rethinking the Measure of Success for Medical Semantic Segmentation in Multi-Instance Segmentation Taskscited by 8
  12. 2024Autopet III challenge: Incorporating anatomical knowledge into nnUNet for lesion segmentation in PET/CTcited by 7
1 more
  1. 2026Advanced Tumor Segmentation in PET/CT Imaging: A Training Strategy Study with nnU-Net for AutoPET IIIcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.