The autoPET3 Challenge: Automated Lesion Segmentation in Whole-Body PET/CT unicodex2013 Multitracer Multicenter Generalization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We report the design and results of the third autoPET challenge (MICCAI 2024), which benchmarked automated lesion segmentation in whole-body PET/CT under a compositional generalization setting. Training data comprised 1,014 [18F]-FDG PET/CT studies from the University Hospital T"ubingen and 597 [18F]/[68Ga]-PSMA PET/CT studies from the LMU University Hospital Munich, constituting the largest publicly available annotated PSMA PET/CT dataset to date. The held-out test set of 200 studies covered four tracer-center combinations, two of which represented unseen compositional pairings. A complementary data-centric award category isolated the contribution of data handling strategies by restricting participants to a fixed baseline model. Seventeen teams submitted 27 algorithms, predominantly nnU-Net-based 3D networks with PET/CT channel concatenation. The top-ranked algorithm achieved a mean DSC of 0.66, FNV of 3.18 mL, and FPV of 2.78 mL across all four test conditions, improving DSC by 8% and reducing the false-negative volume by 5 mL relative to the provided baseline. Ranking was stable across bootstrap resampling and alternative ranking schemes for the top tier. Beyond the benchmark, we provide an in-depth analysis of segmentation performance at the patient and lesion level. Three main conclusions can be drawn: (1) in-domain multitracer PET/CT segmentation is sufficient and probably approaching reader agreement; (2) compositional generalization to unseen tracer-center combinations remains an open problem mainly driven by systematic volume overestimation; (3) heterogeneity and case difficulty drive performance variation substantially more than the choice of algorithm among top-ranked teams.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2026.
Builds on
13 of 59 references.
References · 13
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,950
- 2018Panoptic Segmentationcited by 798
- 2023DataComp: In search of the next generation of multimodal datasetscited by 639
- 20183D MRI brain tumor segmentation using autoencoder regularizationcited by 325
- 2024nnU-Net Revisited: A Call for Rigorous Validation in 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 237
- 2020nnU-Net for Brain Tumor Segmentationcited by 103
- 2024Towards Generalizable Tumor Synthesiscited by 65
- 2019Methods and open-source toolkit for analyzing and visualizing challenge resultscited by 60
- 2023MultiTalent: A Multi-Dataset Approach to Medical Image Segmentationcited by 45
- 2024From FDG to PSMA: A Hitchhiker's Guide to Multitracer, Multicenter Lesion Segmentation in PET/CT Imagingcited by 16
- 2024Every Component Counts: Rethinking the Measure of Success for Medical Semantic Segmentation in Multi-Instance Segmentation Taskscited by 8
- 2024Autopet III challenge: Incorporating anatomical knowledge into nnUNet for lesion segmentation in PET/CTcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Foundation Model-Enabled Efficient Data Sampling (FEEDS): A label-efficient training strategy for pan-cancer, multi-tracer PET/CT datasetscited by 1
- 2026Improving PET/CT-Based Whole-Body Lesion Segmentation Using Prediction Uncertainty-Augmented Modelscited by 0
- 2026Three-Phase Scribble-Adaptive Curriculum Learning for autoPETV Grand Challengecited by 0
- 2026Three-Phase Scribble-Adaptive Curriculum Learning for autoPETV Grand Challenge22 Aug 2026
- 2026Foundation Model-Enabled Efficient Data Sampling (FEEDS): A label-efficient training strategy for pan-cancer, multi-tracer PET/CT datasets11 Aug 2026
- 2026Improving PET/CT-Based Whole-Body Lesion Segmentation Using Prediction Uncertainty-Augmented Models8 Jun 2026