MOSAIC: Module Discovery via Sparse Additive Identifiable Causal Learning for Scientific Time Series
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Causal representation learning (CRL) seeks to recover latent variables with identifiability guarantees, typically up to permutation and component-wise reparameterization under appropriate assumptions. However, identifiability does not imply interpretability: latent semantics are typically assigned post hoc by alignment with known ground-truth factors. This limitation is particularly acute in scientific time series, where underlying mechanisms are unknown and discovering interpretable structure is a primary goal. In contrast, scientific observations (such as residue-pair distances, climate indices, or process sensors) are inherently semantic, as they correspond to named physical quantities. This raises a key question: can the interpretability of observations be transferred to the identifiable latent space? We propose MOSAIC (Module discovery via Sparse Additive Identifiable Causal learning), a sparse temporal VAE that integrates temporal CRL identifiability with support recovery over observed variables. MOSAIC identifies latent variables via regime-conditioned temporal variation, and recovers for each latent a sparse set of associated observations through an additive decoder, yielding module-level interpretability. We show that ANOVA main-effect supports are identifiable under general smooth mixing functions, and provide finite-sample recovery guarantees for a tractable sparse-additive variant. Empirically, MOSAIC recovers domain-consistent variable groups across RNA molecular dynamics, solar wind, ENSO climate, the Tennessee Eastman process, and a synthetic tokamak benchmark, enabling interpretable discovery of latent mechanisms in scientific time series.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2026.
Builds on
21 of 40 references.
References · 21
- 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 941
- 2019Variational Autoencoders and Nonlinear ICA: A Unifying Frameworkcited by 503
- 2016Unsupervised Feature Extraction by Time-Contrastive Learning and Nonlinear ICAcited by 273
- 2017Detecting causal associations in large nonlinear time series datasetscited by 244
- 2021Disentanglement via Mechanism Sparsity Regularization: A New Principle for Nonlinear ICAcited by 160
- 2022Weakly supervised causal representation learningcited by 140
- 2017VAMPnets: Deep learning of molecular kineticscited by 136
- 2020Towards Nonlinear Disentanglement in Natural Data with Temporal Sparse Codingcited by 122
- 2021Learning Temporally Causal Latent Processes from General Temporal Datacited by 98
- 2022On the Identifiability of Nonlinear ICA: Sparsity and Beyondcited by 85
- 2020High-recall causal discovery for autocorrelated time series with latent confounderscited by 84
- 2024Causal Representation Learning from Multiple Distributions: A General Settingcited by 68
9 more
- 2022Temporally Disentangled Representation Learningcited by 61
- 2023Causal Discovery from Temporal Data: An Overview and New Perspectivescited by 43
- 2024Nonparametric Partial Disentanglement via Mechanism Sparsity: Sparse Actions, Interventions and Sparse Temporal Dependenciescited by 41
- 2023Generalizing Nonlinear ICA Beyond Structural Sparsitycited by 34
- 2023Temporally Disentangled Representation Learning under Unknown Nonstationaritycited by 22
- 2024On the Identification of Temporally Causal Representation with Instantaneous Dependencecited by 16
- 2024Causal Temporal Representation Learning with Nonstationary Sparse Transitioncited by 13
- 2026TRACE: Trajectory Recovery for Continuous Mechanism Evolution in Causal Representation Learningcited by 4
- 2024Discovering Latent Causal Graphs from Spatiotemporal Datacited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.