Robustness of Graph Self-Supervised Learning to Real-World Noise: A Case Study on Text-Driven Biomedical Graphs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Graph Self-Supervised Learning (GSSL) offers a powerful paradigm for learning graph representations without labeled data. However, existing work assumes clean, manually curated graphs. Recent advances in NLP enable the large-scale automatic extraction of knowledge graphs from text, opening new opportunities for GSSL while introducing substantial real-world noise. This type of noise remains largely unexplored, as prior robustness studies typically rely on synthetic perturbations. To address this gap, we present the first comprehensive evaluation of GSSL methods on text-driven graphs for unsupervised term typing. We introduce Noise-Aware Text-Driven Graph GSSL (NATD-GSSL), a unified framework that combines automatic graph construction, graph refinement, and GSSL. Our evaluation follows a dual-graph protocol that contrasts a noisy graph derived from MedMentions with a clean Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) reference graph, aligned through a shared gold standard. Our results reveal variability in robustness across both pretext tasks and Graph Neural Network (GNN) architectures. Relation reconstruction is highly sensitive to noise and benefits from well-defined schemas, whereas feature reconstruction is considerably more robust, achieving performance comparable to clean-graph settings. Contrastive objectives are generally less affected by noise but depend strongly on alignment with downstream tasks. GNN architecture also plays a critical role: bidirectional relational message-passing designs are better suited to noisy, text-driven graphs, while unidirectional relational ones perform best on clean graphs. Overall, NATD-GSSL provides practical guidance for applying GSSL to real-world, noisy graphs and achieves up to a 7% improvement over pretrained language model baselines. All code and benchmarks are publicly available at https://github.com/OthmaneKabal/MC2GAE.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2026.
Builds on
34 of 57 references.
References · 34
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,906
- 2017Modeling Relational Data with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,684
- 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,571
- 2016Variational Graph Auto-Encoderscited by 1,373
- 2020Graph Contrastive Learning with Augmentationscited by 1,203
- 2018Deep Graph Infomaxcited by 1,101
- 2014Embedding Entities and Relations for Learning and Inference in Knowledge Basescited by 929
- 2019DropEdge: Towards Deep Graph Convolutional Networks on Node Classificationcited by 679
- 2020Deep Graph Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 535
- 2022GraphMAE: Self-Supervised Masked Graph Autoencoderscited by 443
22 more
- 2018Deep Learning on Graphs: A Surveycited by 393
- 2020Graph Structure Learning for Robust Graph Neural Networkscited by 368
- 2021Graph Self-Supervised Learning: A Surveycited by 289
- 2022A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthy Graph Neural Networks: Privacy, Robustness, Fairness, and Explainabilitycited by 118
- 2019Symmetric Graph Convolutional Autoencoder for Unsupervised Graph Representation Learningcited by 94
- 2019Learning Graph Embedding with Adversarial Training Methodscited by 84
- 2019MedMentions: A Large Biomedical Corpus Annotated with UMLS Conceptscited by 79
- 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Automatic Knowledge Graph Constructioncited by 63
- 2024A Survey of Graph Neural Networks in Real world: Imbalance, Noise, Privacy and OOD Challengescited by 54
- 2025KGGen: Extracting Knowledge Graphs from Plain Text with Language Modelscited by 49
- 2019Heterogeneous Deep Graph Infomaxcited by 42
- 2022A Survey of Deep Graph Clustering: Taxonomy, Challenge, Application, and Open Resourcecited by 26
- 2016Knowledge Graph Representation with Jointly Structural and Textual Encodingcited by 17
- 2019TransGCN:Coupling Transformation Assumptions with Graph Convolutional Networks for Link Predictioncited by 17
- 2022Defending Graph Convolutional Networks against Dynamic Graph Perturbations via Bayesian Self-supervisioncited by 16
- 2019How Robust Are Graph Neural Networks to Structural Noise?cited by 15
- 2023Graph Neural Networks for Text Classification: A Surveycited by 15
- 2024A Simple and Yet Fairly Effective Defense for Graph Neural Networkscited by 12
- 2023Generative and Contrastive Paradigms Are Complementary for Graph Self-Supervised Learningcited by 9
- 2023USER: Unsupervised Structural Entropy-based Robust Graph Neural Networkcited by 5
- 2022Learning Robust Representation through Graph Adversarial Contrastive Learningcited by 4
- 2025Understanding the Effect of Knowledge Graph Extraction Error on Downstream Graph Analyses: A Case Study on Affiliation Graphscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.