mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Estimating Implicit Regularization in Deep Learning

arXiv 2605.05436 ↗First posted 6 May 2026stat.ML cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning systems are known to exhibit implicit regularization (alt. implicit bias), favoring simple solutions instead of merely minimizing the loss function. In some cases, we can analytically derive the implicit regularization -- connecting it to an equivalent penalty that augments the learning objective. However, modern deep learning systems are complex, carrying modifications to the training procedure and architecture (e.g. early stopping, minibatching, dropout) whose effects are not always directly interpretable. Although estimating the resulting implicit regularization could aid theorists in algorithm design and practitioners in interpreting their hyperparameter choices, this problem has received little direct attention. It is also tractable: regularization makes weight updates deviate from loss gradients, promising a signal for identifying implicit bias. Here we provide gradient matching methods that can be used to empirically estimate the implicit regularization. Our method works on networks with known regularization, recovering popular explicit penalties like ℓ1 and ℓ2. It also replicates known implicit effects, like the quadratic weight penalty induced by early stopping in gradient descent, demonstrating that it can be used to test theories of implicit regularization. Crucially, because our method is empirical, it can handle implicit regularization in arbitrary networks. We demonstrate this use by characterizing the effects of dropout in deep networks, showing implicit ℓ2 effects in this popular method. Our work shows that practitioners can use gradient matching to understand regularization in networks with implicit biases that are too complicated to derive analytically.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2026.

Builds on

34 of 47 references.

References · 34

  1. 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,404
  2. 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,337
  3. 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,321
  4. 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 649
  5. 2022Grokking: Generalization Beyond Overfitting on Small Algorithmic Datasetscited by 599
  6. 2020Bayesian Deep Learning and a Probabilistic Perspective of Generalizationcited by 480
  7. 2019Implicit Regularization in Deep Matrix Factorizationcited by 402
  8. 2016Entropy-SGD: Biasing Gradient Descent Into Wide Valleyscited by 357
  9. 2014In Search of the Real Inductive Bias: On the Role of Implicit Regularization in Deep Learningcited by 339
  10. 2017Implicit Regularization in Matrix Factorizationcited by 318
  11. 2020Kernel and Rich Regimes in Overparametrized Modelscited by 302
  12. 2018On the Optimization of Deep Networks: Implicit Acceleration by Overparameterizationcited by 280
22 more
  1. 2020Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent for Wide Two-layer Neural Networks Trained with the Logistic Losscited by 267
  2. 2021Deep learning: a statistical viewpointcited by 239
  3. 2019SGD on Neural Networks Learns Functions of Increasing Complexitycited by 203
  4. 2021On the Origin of Implicit Regularization in Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 183
  5. 2018Deep learning generalizes because the parameter-function map is biased towards simple functionscited by 180
  6. 2020Spectral Bias and Task-Model Alignment Explain Generalization in Kernel Regression and Infinitely Wide Neural Networkscited by 166
  7. 2020The Implicit and Explicit Regularization Effects of Dropoutcited by 71
  8. 2018A Continuous-Time View of Early Stopping for Least Squarescited by 67
  9. 2022On the Maximum Hessian Eigenvalue and Generalizationcited by 57
  10. 2023Gradient Norm Aware Minimization Seeks First-Order Flatness and Improves Generalizationcited by 57
  11. 2025Deep Learning is Not So Mysterious or Differentcited by 55
  12. 2022On the Principles of Parsimony and Self-Consistency for the Emergence of Intelligencecited by 50
  13. 2021On Margin Maximization in Linear and ReLU Networkscited by 34
  14. 2018On the Implicit Bias of Dropoutcited by 22
  15. 2014On the Inductive Bias of Dropoutcited by 19
  16. 2023The Law of Parsimony in Gradient Descent for Learning Deep Linear Networkscited by 19
  17. 2017Dropout as a Low-Rank Regularizer for Matrix Factorizationcited by 14
  18. 2019On Dropout and Nuclear Norm Regularizationcited by 12
  19. 2021Probing as Quantifying Inductive Biascited by 11
  20. 2021Convergence and Implicit Bias of Gradient Flow on Overparametrized Linear Networkscited by 5
  21. 2024Towards Exact Computation of Inductive Biascited by 5
  22. 2025Do Neural Networks Need Gradient Descent to Generalize? A Theoretical Studycited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.