mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Structural Instability of Feature Composition

arXiv 2605.05223 ↗First posted 18 Apr 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) have emerged as a powerful paradigm for disentangling feature superposition in transformer-based architectures, enabling precise control via activation steering. However, the theoretical foundations of compositional steering -- the simultaneous activation of distinct semantic latents -- remain under-explored. The prevailing Linear Representation Hypothesis often abstracts away non-linear interference effects that arise in overcomplete dictionaries. We present a geometric framework for analyzing the instability of feature unions. Modeling the activation space as a high-dimensional sparse cone manifold, we derive an asymptotic compositional-collapse threshold under a spherical dictionary model, characterized by the Gaussian mean width (statistical dimension) of the signal cone. We further show that, in the high-bias regime, ReLU rectification converts microscopic correlation-induced variance fluctuations into a systematic drift that accumulates under composition, yielding interference growth consistent with a ratchet effect. We validate the predicted scaling trends on structured semantic features extracted from CLEVR, where hierarchical correlations accelerate the transition relative to random baselines. Together, our results highlight geometric constraints on the scalability of union-based steering and motivate composition mechanisms that explicitly manage interference beyond naive linear superposition.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 14 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2026.

Builds on

14 of 20 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Sparse Autoencoders Do Not Find Canonical Units of Analysis7 Feb
  2. 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 29 Aug
  3. 2022Toy Models of Superposition21 Sep

Other references · 11

  1. 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,336
  2. 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,085
  3. 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 716
  4. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
  5. 2023Finding Neurons in a Haystack: Case Studies with Sparse Probingcited by 334
  6. 2024Not All Language Model Features Are One-Dimensionally Linearcited by 212
  7. 2023Birth of a Transformer: A Memory Viewpointcited by 161
  8. 2024Analyzing the Generalization and Reliability of Steering Vectorscited by 143
  9. 2025SAEBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Sparse Autoencoders in Language Model Interpretabilitycited by 124
  10. 2022Polysemanticity and Capacity in Neural Networkscited by 77
  11. 2024Steering Without Side Effects: Improving Post-Deployment Control of Language Modelscited by 46

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026From Geometric Recovery to Causal Validation: A Reproducible Audit of Sparse Autoencoder Features, from Superposition Geometry to Causal Inertness
  2. 2026Semantic Optimal Transport for Sparse Autoencoder Feature Matching and Circuit Compression
  3. 2025Sparsification and Reconstruction from the Perspective of Representation Geometry
  4. 2025Understanding sparse autoencoder scaling in the presence of feature manifolds
  5. 2026The Geometric Wall: Manifold Structure Predicts Layerwise Sparse Autoencoder Scaling Laws
  6. 2026Feature Starvation as Geometric Instability in Sparse Autoencoders
  7. 2026Subspace-Aware Sparse Autoencoders for Effective Mechanistic Interpretability
  8. 2026Steering grids for sparse-autoencoder features: when a top-context label names an activation regime rather than a causal axis