mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ANDRE: An Attention-based Neuro-symbolic Differentiable Rule Extractor for Inductive Logic Programming

arXiv 2605.04193 ↗First posted 5 May 2026cs.AI cs.LG cs.LOcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) aims to learn interpretable first-order rules from data, but existing symbolic and neuro-symbolic approaches struggle to scale to noisy and probabilistic settings. Classical ILP relies on discrete combinatorial rule search and is brittle under uncertainty, while differentiable ILP methods typically depend on predefined rule templates or inaccurate fuzzy operators that suffer from vanishing gradients or poor approximation of logical structure when reasoning over probabilistic predicate valuations. This paper proposes an Attention-based Neuro-symbolic Differentiable Rule Extractor (ANDRE), a novel ILP framework that learns first-order logic programs by optimizing over a continuous rule space with attention-based logical operators. ANDRE replaces both rule templates and logical operators with fully differentiable, attention-driven conjunction and disjunction operators that approximate logical min-max semantics, enabling accurate, stable, and interpretable reasoning over probabilistic data. By softly selecting, negating, or excluding predicates within each rule, ANDRE supports flexible rule induction while preserving symbolic structure. Extensive experiments on classical ILP benchmarks, large-scale knowledge bases, and synthetic datasets with probabilistic predicates and noisy supervision demonstrate that ANDRE achieves competitive or superior predictive performance while reliably recovering correct symbolic rules under uncertainty. In particular, ANDRE remains robust to moderate label noise, substantially outperforming existing differentiable ILP methods in both rule extraction quality and stability.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 May 2026.

Builds on

17 of 41 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020Neurosymbolic AI: The 3rd Wavecited by 255
  3. 2017Learning Explanatory Rules from Noisy Datacited by 211
  4. 2020Logic Tensor Networkscited by 199
  5. 2019DRUM: End-To-End Differentiable Rule Mining On Knowledge Graphscited by 175
  6. 2019Neural Logic Machinescited by 145
  7. 2020RNNLogic: Learning Logic Rules for Reasoning on Knowledge Graphscited by 118
  8. 2020Inductive logic programming at 30: a new introductioncited by 85
  9. 2020Learning programs by learning from failurescited by 73
  10. 2025Neuro-Symbolic AI in 2024: A Systematic Reviewcited by 38
  11. 2021Neuro-Symbolic Inductive Logic Programming with Logical Neural Networkscited by 36
  12. 2021Differentiable Inductive Logic Programming for Structured Examplescited by 26
5 more
  1. 2019Inductive Logic Programming via Differentiable Deep Neural Logic Networkscited by 25
  2. 2022Learning First-Order Rules with Differentiable Logic Program Semanticscited by 5
  3. 2025Minimalist Softmax Attention Provably Learns Constrained Boolean Functionscited by 4
  4. 2023Symbolic Imitation Learning: From Black-Box to Explainable Driving Policiescited by 1
  5. 2025Integrating Neurosymbolic AI in Advanced Air Mobility: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.