Local-Time Riemannian Score Matching on the Quantum Pure-State Manifold
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Score-based diffusion can be defined intrinsically on the manifold of quantum pure states, mathbbCPd-1 with the Fubini--Study metric, but no closed-form transition density is available, so the score must be supervised by a local-time teacher taken from the Euclidean limit of the diffusion in normal coordinates. This paper is about what makes that teacher work, and where it stops working. Three training choices turn out not to be incidental: the increment must be divided by the diffusion clock rather than by the elapsed time, since the published expression assumes unit diffusion and a non-unit schedule introduces a time-change mismatch varying by a factor of 400 across the horizon; the logarithm and exponential maps should be the closed-form Fubini--Study ones, which is the largest single effect we measure; and the global phase must be randomised, because horizontal projection alone does not make a score network descend to the quotient. With these choices the model improves on the published Riemannian local-time baseline in every cell of an eight-benchmark, four-metric comparison over ten seeds, significantly on five of eight after Holm correction, and beats an ambient Euclidean baseline by an order of magnitude everywhere. We then bound what the approximation costs by replacing it with the exact heat kernel of mathbbCPd-1, computable up to complex dimension seven, where the local-time teacher loses a factor of 1.2 to 2.7.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 May 2026.
Builds on
26 of 57 references.
References · 26
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
- 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 8,964
- 2020DiffWave: A Versatile Diffusion Model for Audio Synthesiscited by 1,339
- 2022Diffusion Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,107
- 2022Equivariant Diffusion for Molecule Generation in 3Dcited by 666
- 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 654
- 2020WaveGrad: Estimating Gradients for Waveform Generationcited by 620
- 2022GeoDiff: a Geometric Diffusion Model for Molecular Conformation Generationcited by 511
- 2020Power of data in quantum machine learningcited by 336
- 2022Diffusion probabilistic modeling of protein backbones in 3D for the motif-scaffolding problemcited by 229
- 2022Riemannian Score-Based Generative Modellingcited by 216
- 2018Quantum generative adversarial networkscited by 128
14 more
- 2022Riemannian Diffusion Modelscited by 120
- 2022Protein structure generation via folding diffusioncited by 113
- 2018Differentiable Learning of Quantum Circuit Born Machinecited by 90
- 2019The Born Supremacy: Quantum Advantage and Training of an Ising Born Machinecited by 75
- 2023Generative quantum machine learning via denoising diffusion probabilistic modelscited by 30
- 2023Quantum-Noise-Driven Generative Diffusion Modelscited by 20
- 2023Scaling Riemannian Diffusion Modelscited by 18
- 2024Quantum Denoising Diffusion Modelscited by 11
- 2025Dequantified Diffusion-Schr"odinger Bridge for Density Ratio Estimationcited by 11
- 2025EVODiff: Entropy-aware Variance Optimized Diffusion Inferencecited by 10
- 2024Quantum Generative Diffusion Model: A Fully Quantum-Mechanical Model for Generating Quantum State Ensemblecited by 9
- 2024Mixed-State Quantum Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelcited by 6
- 2025Unraveling Quantum Environments: Transformer-Assisted Learning in Lindblad Dynamicscited by 3
- 2024Quantum Diffusion Model for Quark and Gluon Jet Generationcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.