Brainrot: Deskilling and Addiction are Overlooked AI Risks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The scope of AI safety and alignment work in generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has so far mostly been limited to harms related to: (a) discrimination and hate speech, (b) harmful/inappropriate (violent, sexual, illegal) content, (c) information hazards, and (d) use cases related to malicious actors, such as cybersecurity, child abuse, and chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear threats. The public conversation around AI, on the other hand, has also been focusing on threats to our cognition, mental health, and welfare at large, related to over-relying on new technologies, most recently, those related to GenAI. Examples include deskilling associated with cognitive offloading and the atrophy of critical thinking as a result of over-reliance on GenAI systems, and addiction associated with attachment and dependence on GenAI systems. Such risks are rarely addressed, if at all, in the AI safety and alignment literature. In this paper, we highlight and quantify this discrepancy and discuss some initial thoughts on how safety and alignment work could address cognitive and mental health concerns. Finally, we discuss how information campaigns and regulation can be used to mitigate such prominent risks.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 94 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 May 2026.
Builds on
18 of 94 references.
References · 18
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,642
- 2021A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignmentcited by 1,055
- 2020Artificial Intelligence, Values and Alignmentcited by 448
- 2018Scalable agent alignment via reward modeling: a research directioncited by 447
- 2017AI Safety Gridworldscited by 110
- 2025Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt when Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Taskcited by 106
- 2025Expressing stigma and inappropriate responses prevents LLMs from safely replacing mental health providerscited by 69
- 2020The Grey Hoodie Project: Big Tobacco, Big Tech, and the threat on academic integritycited by 38
- 2024AI Risk Categorization Decoded (AIR 2024): From Government Regulations to Corporate Policiescited by 37
6 more
- 2024From Lived Experience to Insight: Unpacking the Psychological Risks of Using AI Conversational Agentscited by 25
- 2026Legal Alignment for Safe and Ethical AIcited by 10
- 2023Regulation and NLP (RegNLP): Taming Large Language Modelscited by 5
- 2022Learning to Suggest Breaks: Sustainable Optimization of Long-Term User Engagementcited by 3
- 2025Decoding Alignment: A Critical Survey of LLM Development Initiatives through Value-setting and Data-centric Lenscited by 3
- 2025What Does 'Human-Centred AI' Mean?cited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.