mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ADAPTS: Agentic Decomposition for Automated Protocol-agnostic Tracking of Symptoms

arXiv 2605.03212 ↗First posted 4 May 2026cs.AI cs.CL cs.HCcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Medical and scientific domain agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Modeling latent clinical constructs from unconstrained clinical interactions is a unique challenge in affective computing. We present ADAPTS (Agentic Decomposition for Automated Protocol-agnostic Tracking of Symptoms), a framework for automated rating of depression and anxiety severity using a mixture-of-agents LLM architecture. This approach decomposes long-form clinical interviews into symptom-specific reasoning tasks, producing auditable justifications while preserving temporal and speaker alignment. Generalization was evaluated across two independent datasets (N=204) with distinct interview structures. On high-discrepancy interviews, automated ratings approximated expert benchmarks (absolute error=22) more closely than original human ratings (absolute error=26). Implementing an ``extended'' protocol that incorporates qualitative clinical conventions significantly stabilized ratings, with absolute agreement reaching ICC(2,1) = 0.877. These findings suggest that the ADAPTS framework enables promising evaluations of psychiatric severity. While the current implementation is purely text-based, the underlying architecture is readily extensible to multimodal inputs, including acoustic and visual features. By approximating expert-level precision in a protocol-agnostic manner, this framework provides a foundation for objective and scalable psychiatric assessment, especially in resource-limited settings.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical and scientific domain agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 8 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2026.

Builds on

8 of 30 references.

References · 8

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  3. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
  4. 2023WhisperX: Time-Accurate Speech Transcription of Long-Form Audiocited by 320
  5. 2019pyannote.audio: neural building blocks for speaker diarizationcited by 175
  6. 2020fairseq S2T: Fast Speech-to-Text Modeling with fairseqcited by 174
  7. 2025Investigation of Whisper ASR Hallucinations Induced by Non-Speech Audiocited by 31
  8. 2024DAIC-WOZ: On the Validity of Using the Therapist's prompts in Automatic Depression Detection from Clinical Interviewscited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026HiMA-MDD: A Hierarchical Multi-Agent Harness for Interpretable Multimodal Depression Detection in Clinical Interviews
  2. 2025MAGI: Multi-Agent Guided Interview for Psychiatric Assessment
  3. 2026Towards Efficient and Robust Linguistic Emotion Diagnosis for Mental Health via Multi-Agent Instruction Refinement
  4. 2026LingxiDiagBench: A Multi-Agent Framework for Benchmarking LLMs in Chinese Psychiatric Consultation and Diagnosis
  5. 2026Self-Evolving Human-Centered Framework for Explainable Depression Symptom Annotation
  6. 2025MoodAngels: A Retrieval-augmented Multi-agent Framework for Psychiatry Diagnosis
  7. 2026DS@GT ARC at eRisk 2026: Hybrid Multi-Agent LLM System with Structured Algorithmic Guidance for Conversational Depression Screening
  8. 2026An Agentic LLM-Based Framework for Population-Scale Mental Health Screening