HiMA-MDD: A Hierarchical Multi-Agent Harness for Interpretable Multimodal Depression Detection in Clinical Interviews
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Depression assessment from multimodal clinical interviews requires integrating dispersed evidence from multiple symptoms into a coherent PHQ-8 profile. This process is hierarchical: relevant evidence is often sparse and context-dependent within local question-answer exchanges, multiple exchanges jointly support symptom-level judgments, and the final assessment depends on the coherence of the complete symptom profile. Existing LLM systems either process interviews holistically or distribute work across generic agent roles; neither design necessarily provides an explicit orchestration mechanism that coordinates evidence access, item-score authority, bounded feedback, and state recording across these levels. To address this gap, we introduce HiMA-MDD, a hierarchical multi-agent harness that aligns this assessment hierarchy with three agent layers. After non-agentic preprocessing constructs context-preserving multimodal QA units, Layer 1 identifies candidate QA-to-item relations and supports bounded item-grounded evidence routing. Layer 2 assigns symptom groups to operational factor specialists, with one specialist responsible for each provisional item score. Layer 3 audits the complete provisional profile, requests at most one round of targeted revision, and reconstructs the verified PHQ-8 profile. This layered design naturally yields a Hierarchical Evidence Trace, preserves all intermediate evidence, judgments, and revisions for auditability. The final item scores then deterministically produce the total score and screening decision. Using Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct as the harness backbone, our experiments on E-DAIC demonstrate that HiMA-MDD outperforms the compared state-of-the-art methods.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Aug 2026.
Builds on
9 of 34 references.
References · 9
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
- 2022Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervisioncited by 4,057
- 2023Are Large Language Model-based Evaluators the Solution to Scaling Up Multilingual Evaluation?cited by 88
- 2024DAIC-WOZ: On the Validity of Using the Therapist's prompts in Automatic Depression Detection from Clinical Interviewscited by 15
- 2025MAGI: Multi-Agent Guided Interview for Psychiatric Assessmentcited by 14
- 2024LLM Questionnaire Completion for Automatic Psychiatric Assessmentcited by 12
- 2024HiQuE: Hierarchical Question Embedding Network for Multimodal Depression Detectioncited by 12
- 2025Enhancing Depression Detection via Question-wise Modality Fusioncited by 3
- 2026Dep-LLM: Training-Free Depression Diagnosis via Evidence-Guided Structured Multi-factor with Reliable LLM Reasoningcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026DepressionAgent: Reading, Listening, Seeing, and Deliberating Multimodal Evidence for Depression Risk Assessment
- 2026ADAPTS: Agentic Decomposition for Automated Protocol-agnostic Tracking of Symptoms
- 2026MERID: Multimodal Exploration via Recursive Self-Improvement Agents for Major Depression Analysis
- 2026DS@GT ARC at eRisk 2026: Hybrid Multi-Agent LLM System with Structured Algorithmic Guidance for Conversational Depression Screening
- 2025MLlm-DR: Towards Explainable Depression Recognition with MultiModal Large Language Models
- 2026LingxiDiagBench: A Multi-Agent Framework for Benchmarking LLMs in Chinese Psychiatric Consultation and Diagnosis
- 2026An Agentic LLM-Based Framework for Population-Scale Mental Health Screening
- 2026Self-Evolving Human-Centered Framework for Explainable Depression Symptom Annotation