OGPO: Sample Efficient Full-Finetuning of Generative Control Policies
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generative control policies (GCPs), such as diffusion- and flow-based control policies, have emerged as effective parameterizations for robot learning. This work introduces Off-policy Generative Policy Optimization (OGPO), a sample-efficient algorithm for finetuning GCPs that maintains off-policy critic networks to maximize data reuse and propagate policy gradients through the full generative process of the policy via a modified PPO objective, using critics as the terminal reward. OGPO achieves state-of-the-art performance on manipulation tasks spanning multi-task settings, high-precision insertion, and dexterous control. To our knowledge, it is also the only method that can fine-tune poorly-initialized behavior cloning policies to near full task-success with no expert data in the online replay buffer, and does so with few task-specific hyperparameter tuning. Through extensive empirical investigations, we demonstrate that OGPO drastically outperforms methods alternatives on policy steering and learning residual corrections, and identify the key mechanisms behind its performance. We further introduce practical stabilization tricks, including success-buffer regularization, two-sided conservative advantages, and Q-variance reduction, to mitigate critic over-exploitation across state- and pixel-based settings. Beyond proposing OGPO, we conduct a systematic empirical study of GCP finetuning, identifying the stabilizing mechanisms and failure modes that govern successful off-policy full-policy improvement.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 53 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2026.
Builds on
53 of 60 references.
References · 53
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Implicit Modelscited by 9,655
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,426
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
- 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flowcited by 3,550
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
- 2023Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusioncited by 2,730
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
38 more
- 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
- 2024π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Controlcited by 2,297
- 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,286
- 2023Consistency Modelscited by 1,778
- 2025π0.5: a Vision-Language-Action Model with Open-World Generalizationcited by 1,653
- 2023Learning Fine-Grained Bimanual Manipulation with Low-Cost Hardwarecited by 1,490
- 2020D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,406
- 2023LIBERO: Benchmarking Knowledge Transfer for Lifelong Robot Learningcited by 1,338
- 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 946
- 2023Training Diffusion Models with Reinforcement Learningcited by 939
- 2023Stochastic Interpolants: A Unifying Framework for Flows and Diffusionscited by 897
- 2018IMPALA: Scalable Distributed Deep-RL with Importance Weighted Actor-Learner Architecturescited by 866
- 2019Advantage-Weighted Regression: Simple and Scalable Off-Policy Reinforcement Learningcited by 750
- 2021What Matters in Learning from Offline Human Demonstrations for Robot Manipulationcited by 699
- 2025FAST: Efficient Action Tokenization for Vision-Language-Action Modelscited by 643
- 2023BridgeData V2: A Dataset for Robot Learning at Scalecited by 634
- 2025Flow-GRPO: Training Flow Matching Models via Online RLcited by 605
- 2019Relay Policy Learning: Solving Long-Horizon Tasks via Imitation and Reinforcement Learningcited by 380
- 2024One Step Diffusion via Shortcut Modelscited by 373
- 2021Randomized Ensembled Double Q-Learning: Learning Fast Without a Modelcited by 278
- 2024Diffusion Policy Policy Optimizationcited by 255
- 2019Multilingual Universal Sentence Encoder for Semantic Retrievalcited by 192
- 2025Steering Your Diffusion Policy with Latent Space Reinforcement Learningcited by 149
- 2018Self-Imitation Learningcited by 135
- 2022Jump-Start Reinforcement Learningcited by 102
- 2024Steering Your Generalists: Improving Robotic Foundation Models via Value Guidancecited by 100
- 2025Reinforcement Learning with Action Chunkingcited by 97
- 2025Flow Matching Policy Gradientscited by 86
- 2018Implicit Reparameterization Gradientscited by 84
- 2022Do Differentiable Simulators Give Better Policy Gradients?cited by 83
- 2025ReinFlow: Fine-tuning Flow Matching Policy with Online Reinforcement Learningcited by 83
- 2024Correcting the Mythos of KL-Regularization: Direct Alignment without Overoptimization via Chi-Squared Preference Optimizationcited by 78
- 2024Policy Agnostic RL: Offline RL and Online RL Fine-Tuning of Any Class and Backbonecited by 71
- 2024Efficient Online Reinforcement Learning Fine-Tuning Need Not Retain Offline Datacited by 58
- 2025e3: Learning to Explore Enables Extrapolation of Test-Time Compute for LLMscited by 56
- 2024Affordance-based Robot Manipulation with Flow Matchingcited by 54
- 2025RL-100: Performant Robotic Manipulation with Real-World Reinforcement Learningcited by 47
- 2025Diffusion Models for Robotic Manipulation: A Surveycited by 39
50 most cited of 53 All 53 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.