Only Say What You Know: Calibration-Aware Generation for Long-Form Factuality
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Reasoning Models achieve strong performance on complex tasks but remain prone to hallucinations, particularly in long-form generation where errors compound across reasoning steps. Existing approaches to improving factuality, including abstention and factuality-driven optimization, follow a coupled exploration-commitment paradigm, in which intermediate reasoning is unconditionally propagated to the final output, limiting fine-grained control over information selection and integration. In this paper, we propose an Exploration-Commitment Decoupling paradigm that disentangles knowledge exploration from final commitment, enabling models to explore with awareness while answering cautiously. We instantiate the paradigm with Calibration-Aware Generation (CAG), a framework that equips models with end-to-end, calibration-aware generation capabilities, by augmenting intermediate reasoning with calibrated reliability estimates and prioritizing reliable content in final outputs. Across five long-form factuality benchmarks and multiple model families, CAG improves factuality by up to 13%, while reducing decoding time by up to 37%. Overall, our work highlights decoupling as a principled approach for more reliable long-form generation, offering directions for trustworthy and self-aware generative systems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 32 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 May 2026.
Builds on
32 of 35 references.
References · 32
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
- 2023Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflectioncited by 1,800
- 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,259
- 2022When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memoriescited by 1,103
- 2023On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakescited by 840
- 2023AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedbackcited by 738
- 2019ELI5: Long Form Question Answeringcited by 567
- 2023LMSYS-Chat-1M: A Large-Scale Real-World LLM Conversation Datasetcited by 449
- 2024Fine-grained Hallucination Detection and Editing for Language Modelscited by 146
- 2024Lookback Lens: Detecting and Mitigating Contextual Hallucinations in Large Language Models Using Only Attention Mapscited by 140
20 more
- 2024VERISCORE: Evaluating the factuality of verifiable claims in long-form text generationcited by 114
- 2023R-Tuning: Instructing Large Language Models to Say `I Don't Know'cited by 106
- 2024Refuse Whenever You Feel Unsafe: Improving Safety in LLMs via Decoupled Refusal Trainingcited by 67
- 2024Learning to Route LLMs with Confidence Tokenscited by 66
- 2025ToolHop: A Query-Driven Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Multi-Hop Tool Usecited by 48
- 2024Can AI Assistants Know What They Don't Know?cited by 47
- 2024FLAME: Factuality-Aware Alignment for Large Language Modelscited by 46
- 2024HalluDial: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Automatic Dialogue-Level Hallucination Evaluationcited by 26
- 2024FactBench: A Dynamic Benchmark for In-the-Wild Language Model Factuality Evaluationcited by 23
- 2025Learning to Reason for Factualitycited by 22
- 2025KnowRL: Exploring Knowledgeable Reinforcement Learning for Factualitycited by 17
- 2024Improving Model Factuality with Fine-grained Critique-based Evaluatorcited by 15
- 2025CompileAgent: Automated Real-World Repo-Level Compilation with Tool-Integrated LLM-based Agent Systemcited by 15
- 2024UAlign: Leveraging Uncertainty Estimations for Factuality Alignment on Large Language Modelscited by 13
- 2025Mitigating LLM Hallucination via Behaviorally Calibrated Reinforcement Learningcited by 13
- 2025FACTORY: A Challenging Human-Verified Prompt Set for Long-Form Factualitycited by 5
- 2025Train for Truth, Keep the Skills: Binary Retrieval-Augmented Reward Mitigates Hallucinationscited by 5
- 2025Odysseus Navigates the Sirens' Song: Dynamic Focus Decoding for Factual and Diverse Open-Ended Text Generationcited by 4
- 2025Teaching LLMs to Abstain via Fine-Grained Semantic Confidence Rewardcited by 2
- 2026Two Pathways to Truthfulness: On the Intrinsic Encoding of LLM Hallucinationscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Think Through Uncertainty: Improving Long-Form Generation Factuality via Reasoning Calibration
- 2026Calibration Drift Under Reasoning: How Chain-of-Thought Budgets Induce Overconfidence in Large Language Models
- 2025MR-Align: Meta-Reasoning Informed Factuality Alignment for Large Reasoning Models
- 2025Thought calibration: Efficient and confident test-time scaling
- 2025Trustworthy Reasoning: Evaluating and Enhancing Factual Accuracy in LLM Intermediate Thought Processes
- 2026EpiCaR: Knowing What You Don't Know Matters for Better Reasoning in LLMs
- 2026On the Pitfalls of Verbalized Confidence Priors for Calibrating Large Reasoning Models
- 2025MONICA: Real-Time Monitoring and Calibration of Chain-of-Thought Sycophancy in Large Reasoning Models