mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Intrinsic Gradient Suppression for Label-Noise Prompt Tuning in Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2605.00591 ↗First posted 1 May 2026cs.CVcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

Abstract (arXiv)

Contrastive vision-language models like CLIP exhibit remarkable zero-shot generalization. However, prompt tuning remains highly sensitive to label noise, as mislabeled samples generate disproportionately large gradients that can overwhelm pre-trained priors. We argue that because CLIP already provides a near-optimal initialization, adaptation should be inherently conservative, particularly against the extreme gradient updates common in noisy settings. To this end, we propose Double-Softmax Prompt Tuning (DSPT), a hyperparameter-free method for intrinsic gradient suppression. By applying a sequential probabilistic normalization, DSPT induces a self-adaptive saturation zone that suppresses gradients from high-error noisy samples while maintaining informative updates. We also provide both theoretical analysis and empirical evidence about how this mechanism achieves adaptive suppression. This design transforms ``gradient vanishing'', traditionally a training bottleneck, into a principled noise-filtering shield for label-noise prompt tuning. Extensive experiments confirm that this simple, drop-in design achieves state-of-the-art robustness across various noisy benchmarks, outperforming methods with complex architectures and handcrafted hyperparameters.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 28 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 May 2026.

Builds on

28 of 42 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024NLPrompt: Noise-Label Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Models2 Dec
  2. 2023Why Is Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models Robust to Noisy Labels?22 Jul
  3. 2022Unsupervised Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Models7 Apr
  4. 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Models10 Mar
  5. 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Models2 Sep

Other references · 23

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  5. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  6. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
  7. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,701
  8. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,488
  9. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
  10. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
  11. 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 441
  12. 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
11 more
  1. 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
  2. 2022Mitigating Neural Network Overconfidence with Logit Normalizationcited by 251
  3. 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
  4. 2020Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?cited by 204
  5. 2020Dual T: Reducing Estimation Error for Transition Matrix in Label-noise Learningcited by 142
  6. 2019Meta Label Correction for Noisy Label Learningcited by 108
  7. 2020Beyond Class-Conditional Assumption: A Primary Attempt to Combat Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 82
  8. 2020Error-Bounded Correction of Noisy Labelscited by 74
  9. 2021Asymmetric Loss Functions for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 46
  10. 2022Mitigating Memorization of Noisy Labels by Clipping the Model Predictioncited by 40
  11. 2021Adaptive Sample Selection for Robust Learning under Label Noisecited by 20

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Robust Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models with Mild Semantic Noise
  2. 2023Gradient-Regulated Meta-Prompt Learning for Generalizable Vision-Language Models
  3. 2025ZIP: An Efficient Zeroth-order Prompt Tuning for Black-box Vision-Language Models
  4. 2026ZOMP: Zeroth-Order Multi-Modal Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
  5. 2024Nemesis: Normalizing the Soft-prompt Vectors of Vision-Language Models
  6. 2026Towards Calibrating Prompt Tuning of Vision-Language Models
  7. 2026Fine-tuning Pre-trained Vision-Language Models in a Human-Annotation-Free Manner
  8. 2025GLAD: Generalizable Tuning for Vision-Language Models