mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ZOMP: Zeroth-Order Multi-Modal Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2608.08060 ↗First posted 8 Aug 2026cs.CVcited by 1

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

Abstract (arXiv)

Fine-tuning vision-language models such as CLIP typically requires backpropagation (BP) through the full model, which is infeasible when only forward-pass access is available, as is common for memory-constrained edge devices and proprietary model deployments. Prior BP-free, zeroth-order prompt-tuning methods avoid this requirement but often tune prompts in a single modality or optimize over a search space large enough that convergence requires thousands of forward passes, which is impractical under realistic query budgets. We propose ZOMP (Zeroth-Order Multimodal Prompt tuning), a query-efficient, fully forward-only method that tunes deep prompts in both the vision and text branches of a frozen CLIP model using simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation. ZOMP combines three ingredients: a cross-modal low-rank reparameterization that ties the two branches through a shared factor and keeps the effective search dimensionality small, a gradient-correction momentum term that stabilizes the noisy zeroth-order estimate, and a budget-indexed rank schedule that unlocks capacity as the query budget is spent. Across 13 vision-language benchmarks under a matched 5,000-query budget, ZOMP consistently outperforms prior BP-free prompt-tuning methods in both few-shot accuracy and query efficiency, and it generalizes better across base-to-new, cross-dataset transfer, and out-of-distribution settings. Our results show that jointly exploiting multimodality and low-rank structure is an effective route to practical, query-efficient BP-free prompt tuning.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 16 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2026.

Builds on

16 of 38 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026MMLoP: Multi-Modal Low-Rank Prompting for Efficient Vision-Language Adaptation24 Feb

Other references · 15

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  3. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
  4. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,701
  5. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  6. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,488
  7. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,445
  8. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
  9. 2017Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification: Benchmark and State of the Artcited by 791
  10. 2013Stochastic First- and Zeroth-order Methods for Nonconvex Stochastic Programmingcited by 716
  11. 2017Zero-Shot Learning -- The Good, the Bad and the Uglycited by 254
  12. 2022Black-Box Tuning for Language-Model-as-a-Servicecited by 254
3 more
  1. 2022Exploiting Unlabeled Data with Vision and Language Models for Object Detectioncited by 97
  2. 2020Transfer Learning without Knowing: Reprogramming Black-box Machine Learning Models with Scarce Data and Limited Resourcescited by 83
  3. 2023BlackVIP: Black-Box Visual Prompting for Robust Transfer Learningcited by 70

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025ZIP: An Efficient Zeroth-order Prompt Tuning for Black-box Vision-Language Models
  2. 2024On the test-time zero-shot generalization of vision-language models: Do we really need prompt learning?
  3. 2025MAO: Efficient Model-Agnostic Optimization of Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
  4. 2022Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Models
  5. 2026Towards Calibrating Prompt Tuning of Vision-Language Models
  6. 2024Generalizable Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
  7. 2025GLAD: Generalizable Tuning for Vision-Language Models
  8. 2025DPC: Dual-Prompt Collaboration for Tuning Vision-Language Models