mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

TypeBandit: Type-Level Context Allocation and Reweighting for Effective Attribute Completion in Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks

arXiv 2604.27356 ↗First posted 30 Apr 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Heterogeneous graphs are widely used to model multi-relational systems, but missing node attributes remain a major bottleneck for downstream learning. In this paper, we identify and formalize type-dependent information asymmetry: the phenomenon that different node types provide substantially different levels of useful signal for attribute completion. Motivated by this observation, we propose TypeBandit, a lightweight, model-agnostic methodology for heterogeneous attribute completion. TypeBandit combines topology-aware initialization, type-level bandit sampling, and joint representation learning. It allocates a finite global sampling budget across node types, samples representative nodes within each type, and uses the resulting sampled type summaries as shared contextual signals during representation construction. By operating at the type level rather than over each target node's local neighborhood, TypeBandit keeps the adaptive state compact and practical for large heterogeneous graphs. A key advantage of TypeBandit is architectural flexibility. Rather than requiring a new heterogeneous graph neural network architecture, TypeBandit acts as a type-aware front end for representative heterogeneous GNN backbones, including R-GCN, HetGNN, HGT, and SimpleHGN. We further introduce a hybrid pretraining scheme that combines structural degree priors with feature propagation, yielding a more reliable initializer than degree-only pretraining. Under a fixed-split protocol on DBLP, IMDB, and ACM, TypeBandit provides dataset-dependent but practically meaningful gains. Additional ablation, stability, efficiency, semantic-propagation, and sampled OGBN-MAG experiments support TypeBandit as a practical strategy for heterogeneous attribute completion when type-specific information is unevenly distributed and sampling resources are limited.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2026.

Builds on

17 of 32 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017Modeling Relational Data with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,684
  2. 2019Heterogeneous Graph Attention Networkcited by 732
  3. 2019GraphSAINT: Graph Sampling Based Inductive Learning Methodcited by 618
  4. 2018FastGCN: Fast Learning with Graph Convolutional Networks via Importance Samplingcited by 583
  5. 2019Cluster-GCN: An Efficient Algorithm for Training Deep and Large Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 540
  6. 2020MAGNN: Metapath Aggregated Graph Neural Network for Heterogeneous Graph Embeddingcited by 304
  7. 2021Are we really making much progress? Revisiting, benchmarking, and refining heterogeneous graph neural networkscited by 176
  8. 2020A Survey on Heterogeneous Graph Embedding: Methods, Techniques, Applications and Sourcescited by 126
  9. 2022Hierarchical Graph Transformer with Adaptive Node Samplingcited by 72
  10. 2022Simple and Efficient Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networkcited by 71
  11. 2021On the Unreasonable Effectiveness of Feature propagation in Learning on Graphs with Missing Node Featurescited by 62
  12. 2023HINormer: Representation Learning On Heterogeneous Information Networks with Graph Transformercited by 35
5 more
  1. 2020Bandit Samplers for Training Graph Neural Networkscited by 30
  2. 2021A Biased Graph Neural Network Sampler with Near-Optimal Regretcited by 17
  3. 2019ActiveHNE: Active Heterogeneous Network Embeddingcited by 11
  4. 2022Enabling Homogeneous GNNs to Handle Heterogeneous Graphs via Relation Embeddingcited by 7
  5. 2024Deeper Insights into Deep Graph Convolutional Networks: Stability and Generalizationcited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.