mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Targeted Linguistic Analysis of Sign Language Models with Minimal Translation Pairs

arXiv 2604.27232 ↗First posted 29 Apr 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Models of sign language have historically lagged behind those for spoken language (text and speech). Recent work has greatly improved their performance on tasks like sign language translation and isolated sign recognition. However, it remains unclear to what extent existing models capture various linguistic phenomena of sign language, and how well they use cues from the multiple articulators used in sign language (hands, upper body, face). We introduce a new benchmark dataset for American Sign Language, ASL Minimal Translation Pairs (ASL-MTP), divided into multiple types of sign language phenomena and corresponding minimal pairs of translations, for performing such linguistic analyses. As a case study, we use ASL-MTP to analyze a state-of-the-art ASL-to-English translation model. We conduct a targeted analysis of the model by ablating various input cues during training and inference and evaluating on the phenomena in ASL-MTP. Our results show that, while the model performs above chance level on most of the phenomena, it relies strongly on manual cues while often missing crucial non-manual cues.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Apr 2026.

Builds on

40 of 84 references.

References · 40

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  3. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,203
  4. 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 564
  5. 2021ByT5: Towards a token-free future with pre-trained byte-to-byte modelscited by 509
  6. 2016Assessing the Ability of LSTMs to Learn Syntax-Sensitive Dependenciescited by 354
  7. 2020Sign Language Transformers: Joint End-to-end Sign Language Recognition and Translationcited by 256
  8. 2018Targeted Syntactic Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 242
  9. 2019Word-level Deep Sign Language Recognition from Video: A New Large-scale Dataset and Methods Comparisoncited by 218
  10. 2020How2Sign: A Large-scale Multimodal Dataset for Continuous American Sign Languagecited by 173
  11. 2023YouTube-ASL: A Large-Scale, Open-Domain American Sign Language-English Parallel Corpuscited by 75
  12. 2022Open-Domain Sign Language Translation Learned from Online Videocited by 72
28 more
  1. 2020Multi-channel Transformers for Multi-articulatory Sign Language Translationcited by 71
  2. 2025MultiBLiMP 1.0: A Massively Multilingual Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairscited by 71
  3. 2024Language Models Learn Rare Phenomena from Less Rare Phenomena: The Case of the Missing AANNscited by 65
  4. 2023SignBERT+: Hand-model-aware Self-supervised Pre-training for Sign Language Understandingcited by 59
  5. 2020Adversarial Training for Multi-Channel Sign Language Productioncited by 57
  6. 2021CLiMP: A Benchmark for Chinese Language Model Evaluationcited by 46
  7. 2024Towards Privacy-Aware Sign Language Translation at Scalecited by 44
  8. 2016How Grammatical is Character-level Neural Machine Translation? Assessing MT Quality with Contrastive Translation Pairscited by 39
  9. 2024YouTube-SL-25: A Large-Scale, Open-Domain Multilingual Sign Language Parallel Corpuscited by 36
  10. 2022The Better Your Syntax, the Better Your Semantics? Probing Pretrained Language Models for the English Comparative Correlativecited by 35
  11. 2024Filtered Corpus Training (FiCT) Shows that Language Models can Generalize from Indirect Evidencecited by 35
  12. 2021Language Models Use Monotonicity to Assess NPI Licensingcited by 31
  13. 2024RuBLiMP: Russian Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairscited by 24
  14. 2020Investigating representations of verb bias in neural language modelscited by 22
  15. 2024SHuBERT: Self-Supervised Sign Language Representation Learning via Multi-Stream Cluster Predictioncited by 22
  16. 2024SignMusketeers: An Efficient Multi-Stream Approach for Sign Language Translation at Scalecited by 19
  17. 2025Both Direct and Indirect Evidence Contribute to Dative Alternation Preferences in Language Modelscited by 18
  18. 2023The Sem-Lex Benchmark: Modeling ASL Signs and Their Phonemescited by 17
  19. 2025What Can String Probability Tell Us About Grammaticality?cited by 16
  20. 2025SignRep: Enhancing Self-Supervised Sign Representationscited by 15
  21. 2022ASL Video Corpora & Sign Bank: Resources Available through the American Sign Language Linguistic Research Project (ASLLRP)cited by 10
  22. 2024FLEURS-ASL: Including American Sign Language in Massively Multilingual Multitask Evaluationcited by 10
  23. 2022Modeling Intensification for Sign Language Generation: A Computational Approachcited by 9
  24. 2024ASL STEM Wiki: Dataset and Benchmark for Interpreting STEM Articlescited by 7
  25. 2020FineHand: Learning Hand Shapes for American Sign Language Recognitioncited by 3
  26. 2024The American Sign Language Knowledge Graph: Infusing ASL Models with Linguistic Knowledgecited by 1
  27. 2025Phonological Representation Learning for Isolated Signs Improves Out-of-Vocabulary Generalizationcited by 1
  28. 2025How Pragmatics Shape Articulation: A Computational Case Study in STEM ASL Discoursecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.