Advancing multi-site emission control: A physics-informed transfer learning framework with mixture of experts for carbon-pollutant synergy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) converts urban waste to energy but simultaneously emits carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide and multiple regulated air pollutants whose formation is tightly coupled within a single combustion system. Controlling these emissions across a network of diverse facilities poses a fundamentally different challenge from optimising a single plant: data-driven models trained at one site capture local statistical patterns that rarely survive transfer to another, because they lack the physical constraints and regime-level structure needed to generalise. Here we show that shared emission-control relationships can be identified across heterogeneous MSWI plants when physical conservation laws, operating-regime heterogeneity and carbon-pollutant coupling are treated jointly. We develop a carbon-pollutant mixture-of-experts (CPMoE) model that routes process observations through regime-specific expert networks under conservation-based regularisation, and combine it with physics-informed transfer learning to adapt a reference model to new facilities. Across 13 plants, CPMoE predicts six major pollutants and a composite system-level risk index with source-domain R2 of 0.668-0.904 and 0.666-0.970, respectively; after transfer to 12 target plants these values remain 0.661-0.842 and 0.610-0.841. Expert-utilisation patterns show that adaptation proceeds through structured regime re-weighting rather than re-learning from scratch. Embedding the transferred model in an offline digital twin and screening candidate operating adjustments against historical process records yields consistent risk-index reductions of 3.6-6.3% with simultaneous pollutant co-reductions in 94-100% of evaluated samples. These findings suggest a practical route toward transferable, system-level decision support for carbon-pollutant co-control in heterogeneous waste-to-energy networks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Apr 2026.
Builds on
5 of 53 references.
References · 5
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,160
- 2021Transformer in Transformercited by 633
- 2022DeepSpeed-MoE: Advancing Mixture-of-Experts Inference and Training to Power Next-Generation AI Scalecited by 404
- 2023Physics-Informed Machine Learning for Modeling and Control of Dynamical Systemscited by 28
- 2020Deep Transfer Learning for Industrial Automation: A Review and Discussion of New Techniques for Data-Driven Machine Learningcited by 11
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Learning When to Transfer: Reinforcement Learning for Carbon-Footprint Modeling in New Manufacturing Domains
- 2025Online Fine-Tuning of Carbon Emission Predictions using Real-Time Recurrent Learning for State Space Models
- 2026Toward Mechanistic Interpretability of an AI Foundation Model Fine-Tuned for Atmospheric Chemistry
- 2026From fragmented data to actionable design: Physics-calibrated learning for plastic upcycling
- 2026Optimal trajectory-guided stochastic co-optimization for e-fuel system design and real-time operation
- 2026AeroChem: Closed-loop Physics-Informed State Space Modeling for Long-term Chemically-Reactive Air Quality Forecasting--Extended Version
- 2026A Latent Space Framework for Modeling Transient Engine Emissions Using Joint Embedding Predictive Architectures ↗
- 2026Reaction-network reasoning with frontier models for experimentally confirmed catalyst-selectivity hypotheses