mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning When to Transfer: Reinforcement Learning for Carbon-Footprint Modeling in New Manufacturing Domains

arXiv 2610.18730 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2026cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL for energy, networks and operations also fits: RL with diffusion and flow models

Abstract (arXiv)

Manufacturers often need to characterize a new material, process, or product before enough operating data are available to train reliable predictive models for this new, target domain. Existing manufacturing operations contain potentially useful knowledge to accelerate this characterization, but indiscriminate reuse of data from existing source domains can cause negative transfer in learning of the new, target domain when the manufacturing domains differ sufficiently. This work proposes a reinforcement-learning method for selective knowledge transfer, where its reward scores each opportunity to transfer against supervised alternatives, so negative transfer is avoided and controlled during forward prediction instead of being diagnosed afterwards. Given limited data from a new target domain, the learned policy chooses among predictors based on individual source operations, subsets of the sources, or the supervised alternatives: fully pooled sources, or target data alone. A validation gate deploys the transferred prediction only when it improves upon the supervised alternatives. The method is designed for learning variables supporting carbon accounting, as well as performance and quality outcomes. We demonstrate the approach by quantifying the embodied greenhouse-gas emissions of parts produced via material-extrusion additive manufacturing, using data from 729 experiments spanning five materials: ABS, PETG, TPU, PLA, and recycled PLA. The response combines measured fabrication electricity with polymer-specific cradle-to-gate production factors, while 22 material, process, and toolpath features characterize each experiment. In leave-one-material-out evaluation, this method achieves a mean test RMSE of 5.2 g CO2e per part, 20.00% lower than target-only training (32.5% lower when only 5-10% of the target training data are available) and 10.30% lower than indiscriminate source-target pooling.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL for energy, networks and operations, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 2 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2026.

Builds on

2 of 20 references.

References · 2

  1. 2018Characterizing and Avoiding Negative Transfercited by 229
  2. 2017Safe Policy Improvement with Baseline Bootstrappingcited by 144

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Latent Pollution Model: The Hidden Carbon Footprint in 3D Image Synthesis
  2. 2025LLM-Upgraded Graph Reinforcement Learning for Carbon-Aware Job Scheduling in Smart Manufacturing
  3. 2026Advancing multi-site emission control: A physics-informed transfer learning framework with mixture of experts for carbon-pollutant synergy
  4. 2024PAIL: Performance based Adversarial Imitation Learning Engine for Carbon Neutral Optimization
  5. 2026Minimizing Material Waste in Additive Manufacturing through Online Reel Assignment ↗
  6. 2024Reinforcement Feature Transformation for Polymer Property Performance Prediction
  7. 2026Calibration-First Reward-Component Auditing for Reinforcement Learning Control in Smart Greenhouses
  8. 2026Physics-informed offline reinforcement learning eliminates catastrophic fuel waste in maritime routing