mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sample Selection Using Multi-Task Autoencoders in Federated Learning with Non-IID Data

arXiv 2604.26116 ↗First posted 28 Apr 2026cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning is a machine learning paradigm in which multiple devices collaboratively train a model under the supervision of a central server while ensuring data privacy. However, its performance is often hindered by redundant, malicious, or abnormal samples, leading to model degradation and inefficiency. To overcome these issues, we propose novel sample selection methods for image classification, employing a multitask autoencoder to estimate sample contributions through loss and feature analysis. Our approach incorporates unsupervised outlier detection, using one-class support vector machine (OCSVM), isolation forest (IF), and adaptive loss threshold (AT) methods managed by a central server to filter noisy samples on clients. We also propose a multi-class deep support vector data description (SVDD) loss controlled by a central server to enhance feature-based sample selection. We validate our methods on CIFAR10 and MNIST datasets across varying numbers of clients, non-IID distributions, and noise levels up to 40%. The results show significant accuracy improvements with loss-based sample selection, achieving gains of up to 7.02% on CIFAR10 with OCSVM and 1.83% on MNIST with AT. Additionally, our federated SVDD loss further improves feature-based sample selection, yielding accuracy gains of up to 0.99% on CIFAR10 with OCSVM. These results show the effectiveness of our methods in improving model accuracy across various client counts and noise conditions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2026.

Builds on

14 of 35 references.

References · 14

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  2. 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,531
  3. 2019Robust and Communication-Efficient Federated Learning from Non-IID Datacited by 415
  4. 2017A Downsampled Variant of ImageNet as an Alternative to the CIFAR datasetscited by 374
  5. 2018Not All Samples Are Created Equal: Deep Learning with Importance Samplingcited by 323
  6. 2020FedML: A Research Library and Benchmark for Federated Machine Learningcited by 298
  7. 2020A Principled Approach to Data Valuation for Federated Learningcited by 127
  8. 2020Learning to Detect Malicious Clients for Robust Federated Learningcited by 86
  9. 2019Measure Contribution of Participants in Federated Learningcited by 78
  10. 2022FedBalancer: Data and Pace Control for Efficient Federated Learning on Heterogeneous Clientscited by 46
  11. 2019Abnormal Client Behavior Detection in Federated Learningcited by 39
  12. 2021FedCCEA : A Practical Approach of Client Contribution Evaluation for Federated Learningcited by 14
2 more
  1. 2021Efficient Client Contribution Evaluation for Horizontal Federated Learningcited by 12
  2. 2022Anomaly Detection through Unsupervised Federated Learningcited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.