mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards Lawful Autonomous Driving: Deriving Scenario-Aware Driving Requirements from Traffic Laws and Regulations

arXiv 2604.24562 ↗First posted 27 Apr 2026cs.AI cs.CL cs.CYcited by 0

On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → Large language models for driving

Abstract (arXiv)

Driving in compliance with traffic laws and regulations is a basic requirement for human drivers, yet autonomous vehicles (AVs) can violate these requirements in diverse real-world scenarios. To encode law compliance into AV systems, conventional approaches use formal logic languages to explicitly specify behavioral constraints, but this process is labor-intensive, hard to scale, and costly to maintain. With recent advances in artificial intelligence, it is promising to leverage large language models (LLMs) to derive legal requirements from traffic laws and regulations. However, without explicitly grounding and reasoning in structured traffic scenarios, LLMs often retrieve irrelevant provisions or miss applicable ones, yielding imprecise requirements. To address this, we propose a novel pipeline that grounds LLM reasoning in a traffic scenario taxonomy through node-wise anchors that encode hierarchical semantics. On Chinese traffic laws and OnSite dataset (5,897 scenarios), our method improves law-scenario matching by 29.1% and increases the accuracy of derived mandatory and prohibitive requirements by 36.9% and 38.2%, respectively. We further demonstrate real-world applicability by constructing a law-compliance layer for AV navigation and developing an onboard, real-time compliance monitor for in-field testing, providing a solid foundation for future AV development, deployment, and regulatory oversight.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Large language models for driving, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 21 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Apr 2026.

Builds on

21 of 60 references.

References · 21

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  4. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  5. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  6. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  7. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
  8. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,234
  9. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,075
  10. 2022Planning-oriented Autonomous Drivingcited by 1,087
  11. 2023VAD: Vectorized Scene Representation for Efficient Autonomous Drivingcited by 622
  12. 2025AutoVLA: A Vision-Language-Action Model for End-to-End Autonomous Driving with Adaptive Reasoning and Reinforcement Fine-Tuningcited by 260
9 more
  1. 2024G-Retriever: Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Textual Graph Understanding and Question Answeringcited by 223
  2. 2020The Next Decade in AI: Four Steps Towards Robust Artificial Intelligencecited by 195
  3. 2025ORION: A Holistic End-to-End Autonomous Driving Framework by Vision-Language Instructed Action Generationcited by 178
  4. 2025End-to-End Driving with Online Trajectory Evaluation via BEV World Modelcited by 151
  5. 2017On a Formal Model of Safe and Scalable Self-driving Carscited by 131
  6. 2025LinearRAG: Linear Graph Retrieval Augmented Generation on Large-scale Corporacited by 49
  7. 2025SafeAuto: Knowledge-Enhanced Safe Autonomous Driving with Multimodal Foundation Modelscited by 23
  8. 2022An Ethical Trajectory Planning Algorithm for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 16
  9. 2022No driver, No Regulation? --Online Legal Driving Behavior Monitoring for Self-driving Vehiclescited by 10

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Driving with Regulation: Trustworthy and Interpretable Decision-Making for Autonomous Driving with Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning
  2. 2026Reasoning to Regulate: Chain-of-Thought for Traffic Rule Understanding
  3. 2024TR2MTL: LLM based framework for Metric Temporal Logic Formalization of Traffic Rules
  4. 2026DriveCombo: Benchmarking Compositional Traffic Rule Reasoning in Autonomous Driving
  5. 2024Hybrid Reasoning Based on Large Language Models for Autonomous Car Driving
  6. 2023LLM4Drive: A Survey of Large Language Models for Autonomous Driving
  7. 2026Reason--Imagine--Act: Closed-Loop LLM Decision Making with World Models for Autonomous Driving
  8. 2025Human-like Semantic Navigation for Autonomous Driving using Knowledge Representation and Large Language Models