mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Limit Theory of Foundation Models: A Mathematical Approach to Understanding Emergent Intelligence and Scaling Laws

arXiv 2604.24037 ↗First posted 27 Apr 2026cs.LG math.ST stat.THcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Emergent intelligence have played a major role in the modern AI development. While existing studies primarily rely on empirical observations to characterize this phenomenon, a rigorous theoretical framework remains underexplored. This study attempts to develop a mathematical approach to formalize emergent intelligence from the perspective of limit theory. Specifically, we introduce a performance function E(N, P, K), dependent on data size N, model size P and training steps K, to quantify intelligence behavior. We posit that intelligence emerges as a transition from finite to effectively infinite knowledge, and thus recast emergent intelligence as existence of the limit limN,P,K → ∞ E(N,P,K), with emergent abilities corresponding to the limiting behavior. This limit theory helps reveal that emergent intelligence originates from the existence of a parameter-limit architecture (referred to as the limit architecture), and that emergent intelligence rationally corresponds to the learning behavior of this limit system. By introducing tools from nonlinear Lipschitz operator theory, we prove that the necessary and sufficient conditions for existence of the limit architecture. Furthermore, we derive the scaling law of foundation models by leveraging tools of Lipschitz operator and covering number. Theoretical results show that: 1) emergent intelligence is governed by three key factors-training steps, data size and the model architecture, where the properties of basic blocks play a crucial role in constructing foundation models; 2) the critical condition Lip(T)=1 for emergent intelligence provides theoretical support for existing findings. 3) emergent intelligence is determined by an infinite-dimensional system, yet can be effectively realized in practice through a finite-dimensional architecture. Our empirical results corroborate these theoretical findings.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 164 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Apr 2026.

Builds on

37 of 164 references.

References · 37

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  4. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  5. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  6. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  7. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  8. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
  9. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
  10. 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,224
  11. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,592
  12. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
25 more
  1. 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,120
  2. 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,986
  3. 2019Generating Long Sequences with Sparse Transformerscited by 1,546
  4. 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 991
  5. 2023Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Modelscited by 872
  6. 2024DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Modelscited by 867
  7. 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 582
  8. 2024Improve Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models by Automated Process Supervisioncited by 441
  9. 2024Understanding the planning of LLM agents: A surveycited by 421
  10. 2025rStar-Math: Small LLMs Can Master Math Reasoning with Self-Evolved Deep Thinkingcited by 313
  11. 2021Scaling Laws for Transfercited by 272
  12. 2021DialogSum: A Real-Life Scenario Dialogue Summarization Datasetcited by 183
  13. 2024Scaling Laws for Fine-Grained Mixture of Expertscited by 173
  14. 2023Sudden Drops in the Loss: Syntax Acquisition, Phase Transitions, and Simplicity Bias in MLMscited by 124
  15. 2022A Solvable Model of Neural Scaling Lawscited by 116
  16. 2024Language models scale reliably with over-training and on downstream taskscited by 113
  17. 2024Chinchilla Scaling: A replication attemptcited by 72
  18. 2024Scaling and renormalization in high-dimensional regressioncited by 50
  19. 2026There Will Be a Scientific Theory of Deep Learningcited by 29
  20. 2025The Universal Weight Subspace Hypothesiscited by 24
  21. 2024Phase transition in large language models and the criticality of natural languagescited by 13
  22. 2024U-shaped and Inverted-U Scaling behind Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 10
  23. 2025FairTranslate: An English-French Dataset for Gender Bias Evaluation in Machine Translation by Overcoming Gender Binaritycited by 5
  24. 2018Reducing over-clustering via the powered Chinese restaurant processcited by 3
  25. 2025Critical dynamics governs deep learningcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.