mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Assessing the Capability of YOLO- and Transformer-based Object Detectors for Real-time Weed Detection

arXiv 2501.17387 ↗First posted 29 Jan 2025cs.CVcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Spot spraying represents an efficient and sustainable method for reducing the amount of pesticides, particularly herbicides, used in agricultural fields. To achieve this, it is of utmost importance to reliably differentiate between crops and weeds, and even between individual weed species in situ and under real-time conditions. To assess suitability for real-time application, different object detection models that are currently state-of-the-art are compared. All available models of YOLOv8, YOLOv9, YOLOv10, and RT-DETR are trained and evaluated with images from a real field situation. The images are separated into two distinct datasets: In the initial data set, each species of plants is trained individually; in the subsequent dataset, a distinction is made between monocotyledonous weeds, dicotyledonous weeds, and three chosen crops. The results demonstrate that while all models perform equally well in the metrics evaluated, the YOLOv9 models, particularly the YOLOv9s and YOLOv9e, stand out in terms of their strong recall scores (66.58 % and 72.36 %), as well as mAP50 (73.52 % and 79.86 %), and mAP50-95 (43.82 % and 47.00 %) in dataset 2. However, the RT-DETR models, especially RT-DETR-l, excel in precision with reaching 82.44 % on dataset 1 and 81.46 % in dataset 2, making them particularly suitable for scenarios where minimizing false positives is critical. In particular, the smallest variants of the YOLO models (YOLOv8n, YOLOv9t, and YOLOv10n) achieve substantially faster inference times down to 7.58 ms for dataset 2 on the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 GPU for analyzing one frame, while maintaining competitive accuracy, highlighting their potential for deployment in resource-constrained embedded computing devices as typically used in productive setups.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2025.

Builds on

13 of 55 references.

References · 13

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  4. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  5. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
  6. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,414
  7. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,852
  8. 2023DETRs Beat YOLOs on Real-time Object Detectioncited by 533
  9. 2024YOLOv9: Learning What You Want to Learn Using Programmable Gradient Informationcited by 425
  10. 2018Deep Learning for Generic Object Detection: A Surveycited by 392
  11. 2024Comparative Analysis of YOLOv9, YOLOv10 and RT-DETR for Real-Time Weed Detectioncited by 7
  12. 2024Enhancing weed detection performance by means of GenAI-based image augmentationcited by 3
1 more
  1. 2024Small Object Detection by DETR via Information Augmentation and Adaptive Feature Fusioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.