mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ReLeVAnT: Relevance Lexical Vectors for Accurate Legal Text Classification

arXiv 2604.22292 ↗First posted 24 Apr 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The classification of legal documents from an unstructured data corpus has several crucial applications in downstream tasks. Documents relevant to court filings are key in use cases such as drafting motions, memos, and outlines, as well as in tasks like docket summarisation, retrieval systems, and training data curation. Current methods classify based on provided metadata, LLM-extracted metadata, or multimodal methods. These methods depend on structured data, metadata, and extensive computational power. This task is approached from a perspective of leveraging discriminative features in the documents between classes. The authors propose ReLeVAnT, a framework for legal document binary classification. ReLeVAnT utilises n-gram processing, contrastive score matching, and a shallow neural network as the primary drivers for discriminative classification. It leverages one-time keyword extraction per corpus, followed by a shallow classifier to swiftly and reliably classify documents with 99.3% accuracy and 98.7% F1 score on the LexGLUE dataset.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2026.

Builds on

9 of 28 references.

References · 9

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2016Bag of Tricks for Efficient Text Classificationcited by 876
  3. 2021LexGLUE: A Benchmark Dataset for Legal Language Understanding in Englishcited by 310
  4. 2020How Does NLP Benefit Legal System: A Summary of Legal Artificial Intelligencecited by 129
  5. 2024LegalBench-RAG: A Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation in the Legal Domaincited by 118
  6. 2019Large-Scale Multi-Label Text Classification on EU Legislationcited by 104
  7. 2021Incorporating Domain Knowledge for Extractive Summarization of Legal Case Documentscited by 23
  8. 2015Autonomy and Reliability of Continuous Active Learning for Technology-Assisted Reviewcited by 13
  9. 2019Information criteria for non-normalized modelscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.