An Experimental Design Approach for Regret Minimization in Logistic Bandits
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this work we consider the problem of regret minimization for logistic bandits. The main challenge of logistic bandits is reducing the dependence on a potentially large problem dependent constant kappa that can at worst scale exponentially with the norm of the unknown parameter θast. Abeille et al. (2021) have applied self-concordance of the logistic function to remove this worst-case dependence providing regret guarantees like O(dlog2(kappa)√dotμ Tlog(|X|)) where d is the dimensionality, T is the time horizon, and dotμ is the variance of the best-arm. This work improves upon this bound in the fixed arm setting by employing an experimental design procedure that achieves a minimax regret of O(√d dotμ Tlog(|X|)). Our regret bound in fact takes a tighter instance (i.e., gap) dependent regret bound for the first time in logistic bandits. We also propose a new warmup sampling algorithm that can dramatically reduce the lower order term in the regret in general and prove that it can replace the lower order term dependency on kappa to log2(kappa) for some instances. Finally, we discuss the impact of the bias of the MLE on the logistic bandit problem, providing an example where d2 lower order regret (cf., it is d for linear bandits) may not be improved as long as the MLE is used and how bias-corrected estimators may be used to make it closer to d.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2022.
Builds on
13 of 42 references.
References · 13
- 2020Beyond UCB: Optimal and Efficient Contextual Bandits with Regression Oraclescited by 195
- 2020Improved Optimistic Algorithms for Logistic Banditscited by 117
- 2019Sequential Experimental Design for Transductive Linear Banditscited by 88
- 2020Instance-Wise Minimax-Optimal Algorithms for Logistic Banditscited by 56
- 2021High-Dimensional Experimental Design and Kernel Banditscited by 55
- 2017Provably Optimal Algorithms for Generalized Linear Contextual Banditscited by 38
- 2019On the Performance of Thompson Sampling on Logistic Banditscited by 32
- 2020Improved Confidence Bounds for the Linear Logistic Model and Applications to Linear Banditscited by 31
- 2017Stochastic Low-Rank Banditscited by 28
- 2018PG-TS: Improved Thompson Sampling for Logistic Contextual Banditscited by 18
- 2018Contextual Multi-Armed Bandits for Causal Marketingcited by 17
- 2020Experimental Design for Regret Minimization in Linear Banditscited by 11
1 more
- 2018Adaptive, Personalized Diversity for Visual Discoverycited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2024A Unified Confidence Sequence for Generalized Linear Models, with Applications to Banditscited by 27
- 2024Generalized Linear Bandits with Limited Adaptivitycited by 22
- 2024Optimal Design for Human Preference Elicitationcited by 17
- 2025Generalized Linear Bandits: Almost Optimal Regret with One-Pass Updatecited by 16
- 2023Kullback-Leibler Maillard Sampling for Multi-armed Bandits with Bounded Rewardscited by 2
- 2026Logistic Bandits with tildeO(√dT) Regret without Context Diversity Assumptionscited by 0
- 2026Minimax Optimal Regret for Causal Logistic Bandits with Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 0
- 2026Minimax Optimal Regret for Causal Logistic Bandits with Counterfactual Fairness1 Oct 2026
- 2026Logistic Bandits with tildeO(√dT) Regret without Context Diversity Assumptions24 Apr 2026
- 2025Generalized Linear Bandits: Almost Optimal Regret with One-Pass Update16 Jul 2025
- 2024A Unified Confidence Sequence for Generalized Linear Models, with Applications to Bandits19 Jul 2024
- 2024Optimal Design for Human Preference Elicitation22 Apr 2024
- 2024Generalized Linear Bandits with Limited Adaptivity10 Apr 2024
- 2023Kullback-Leibler Maillard Sampling for Multi-armed Bandits with Bounded Rewards28 Apr 2023