CoFEE: Reasoning Control for LLM-Based Feature Discovery
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Feature discovery from complex unstructured data is fundamentally a reasoning problem: it requires identifying abstractions that are predictive of a target outcome while avoiding leakage, proxies, and post-outcome signals. With the introduction of ever-improving Large Language Models (LLMs), our method provides a structured method for addressing this challenge. LLMs are well suited for this task by being able to process large amounts of information, but unconstrained feature generation can lead to weak features. In this work, we study reasoning control in LLMs by inducing cognitive behaviors for improving feature discovery. We introduce CoFEE (Cognitive Feature Engineering Engine), a reasoning control framework that enforces cognitive behaviors in how the LLM reasons during feature discovery. From a machine learning perspective, these cognitive behaviors act as structured inductive biases over the space of candidate features generated by the model. These behaviors have been exploited with success in ML models, and include backward chaining from outcomes, subgoal decomposition, verification against observability and leakage criteria, and explicit backtracking of rejected reasoning paths. In a controlled comparison, we show that enforcing cognitive behaviors yields features with higher empirical predictability than those under unconstrained vanilla LLM prompts. CoFEE achieves an average Success Rate Score that is 15.2% higher than the vanilla approach, while generating 29% fewer features and reducing costs by 53.3%. Using held-out feature evaluation, we assess whether cognitively induced features generalize beyond the data used for discovery. Our results indicate that, in our evaluated setting, reasoning control is associated with improvements in quality and efficiency of LLM-based feature discovery.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 7 of its 7 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Apr 2026.
Builds on
7 of 7 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 6
- 2025Cognitive Behaviors that Enable Self-Improving Reasoners, or, Four Habits of Highly Effective STaRscited by 375
- 2025Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 178
- 2023Position: AI Evaluation Should Learn from How We Test Humanscited by 36
- 2017An Empirical Analysis of Feature Engineering for Predictive Modelingcited by 29
- 2025AStar: Boosting Multimodal Reasoning with Automated Structured Thinkingcited by 25
- 2024GPTree: Towards Explainable Decision-Making via LLM-powered Decision Treescited by 13
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025FeRG-LLM : Feature Engineering by Reason Generation Large Language Models
- 2025Tabular Feature Discovery With Reasoning Type Exploration
- 2025LLM-FE: Automated Feature Engineering for Tabular Data with LLMs as Evolutionary Optimizers
- 2025Feature Engineering for Agents: An Adaptive Cognitive Architecture for Interpretable ML Monitoring
- 2025From Reasoning to Learning: A Survey on Hypothesis Discovery and Rule Learning with Large Language Models
- 2024DiscoveryBench: Towards Data-Driven Discovery with Large Language Models
- 2026Unsupervised Features Mining via Activation Geometry
- 2025Improving Reasoning Performance in Large Language Models via Representation Engineering