Feature Engineering for Agents: An Adaptive Cognitive Architecture for Interpretable ML Monitoring
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
Monitoring Machine Learning (ML) models in production environments is crucial, yet traditional approaches often yield verbose, low-interpretability outputs that hinder effective decision-making. We propose a cognitive architecture for ML monitoring that applies feature engineering principles to agents based on Large Language Models (LLMs), significantly enhancing the interpretability of monitoring outputs. Central to our approach is a Decision Procedure module that simulates feature engineering through three key steps: Refactor, Break Down, and Compile. The Refactor step improves data representation to better capture feature semantics, allowing the LLM to focus on salient aspects of the monitoring data while reducing noise and irrelevant information. Break Down decomposes complex information for detailed analysis, and Compile integrates sub-insights into clear, interpretable outputs. This process leads to a more deterministic planning approach, reducing dependence on LLM-generated planning, which can sometimes be inconsistent and overly general. The combination of feature engineering-driven planning and selective LLM utilization results in a robust decision support system, capable of providing highly interpretable and actionable insights. Experiments using multiple LLMs demonstrate the efficacy of our approach, achieving significantly higher accuracy compared to various baselines across several domains.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 14 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2025.
Builds on
14 of 17 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 13
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
- 2023Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Modelscited by 560
- 2018Detecting and Correcting for Label Shift with Black Box Predictorscited by 366
- 2018Failing Loudly: An Empirical Study of Methods for Detecting Dataset Shiftcited by 243
- 2024Self-Discover: Large Language Models Self-Compose Reasoning Structurescited by 110
- 2022A monitoring framework for deployed machine learning models with supply chain examplescited by 5
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026CoFEE: Reasoning Control for LLM-Based Feature Discovery
- 2025FELA: A Multi-Agent Evolutionary System for Feature Engineering of Industrial Event Log Data
- 2024Watson: A Cognitive Observability Framework for the Reasoning of LLM-Powered Agents
- 2026LLM-Driven Reasoning for Constraint-Aware Feature Selection in Industrial Systems
- 2024Leveraging Knowlegde Graphs for Interpretable Feature Generation
- 2026Towards Reliable ML Feature Engineering via Planning in Constrained-Topology of LLM Agents
- 2026Beyond the Black Box: Interpretability of Agentic AI Tool Use
- 2026KC-Agent: A Dual-Process Cognitive Architecture for Efficient ML Model Improvement