mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LLM-Guided Safety Agent for Edge Robotics with an ISO-Compliant Perception-Compute-Control Architecture

arXiv 2604.20193 ↗First posted 22 Apr 2026cs.ROcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Ensuring functional safety in human-robot interaction is challenging because AI perception is inherently probabilistic, whereas industrial standards require deterministic behavior. We present an LLM-guided safety agent for edge robotics, built on an ISO-compliant low-latency perception-compute-control architecture. Our method translates natural-language safety regulations into executable predicates and deploys them through a redundant heterogeneous edge runtime. For fault-tolerant closed-loop execution under edge constraints, we adopt a symmetric dual-modular redundancy design with parallel independent execution for low-latency perception, computation, and control. We prototype the system on a dual-RK3588 platform and evaluate it in representative human-robot interaction scenarios. The results demonstrate a practical edge implementation path toward ISO 13849 Category 3 and PL d using cost-effective hardware, supporting practical deployment of safety-critical embodied AI.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 8 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2026.

Builds on

8 of 24 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Plug in the Safety Chip: Enforcing Constraints for LLM-driven Robot Agents18 Sep

Other references · 7

  1. 2019Learning Regularity in Skeleton Trajectories for Anomaly Detection in Videoscited by 103
  2. 2023Can Large Language Models Transform Natural Language Intent into Formal Method Postconditions?cited by 53
  3. 2024Semantically Safe Robot Manipulation: From Semantic Scene Understanding to Motion Safeguardscited by 16
  4. 2026Grounding Generative Planners in Verifiable Logic: A Hybrid Architecture for Trustworthy Embodied AIcited by 4
  5. 2024IPAD: Industrial Process Anomaly Detection Datasetcited by 3
  6. 2025Executable Governance for AI: Translating Policies into Rules Using LLMscited by 3
  7. 2026Pre-Execution Safety Gate & Task Safety Contracts for LLM-Controlled Robot Systemscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Safety Aware Task Planning via Large Language Models in Robotics
  2. 2025SafePlan: Leveraging Formal Logic and Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Enhanced Safety in LLM-based Robotic Task Planning
  3. 2025RoboSafe: Safeguarding Embodied Agents via Executable Safety Logic
  4. 2025A Framework for Benchmarking and Aligning Task-Planning Safety in LLM-Based Embodied Agents
  5. 2024Safeguarding AI Agents: Developing and Analyzing Safety Architectures
  6. 2026ForesightSafety-VLA: A Unified Diagnostic Safety Benchmark for Vision-Language-Action Models
  7. 2026How Long Until Your Robot Ignores You? A Safety Benchmark for LLM Orchestrators in Human-Humanoid Collaboration ↗
  8. 2026VLPSA: Vision-Language-Poisson-Safe Actions for Full-Body Safety of Learned Policies