mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Semantically Safe Robot Manipulation: From Semantic Scene Understanding to Motion Safeguards

arXiv 2410.15185 ↗First posted 19 Oct 2024cs.ROcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Ensuring safe interactions in human-centric environments requires robots to understand and adhere to constraints recognized by humans as "common sense" (e.g., "moving a cup of water above a laptop is unsafe as the water may spill" or "rotating a cup of water is unsafe as it can lead to pouring its content"). Recent advances in computer vision and machine learning have enabled robots to acquire a semantic understanding of and reason about their operating environments. While extensive literature on safe robot decision-making exists, semantic understanding is rarely integrated into these formulations. In this work, we propose a semantic safety filter framework to certify robot inputs with respect to semantically defined constraints (e.g., unsafe spatial relationships, behaviors, and poses) and geometrically defined constraints (e.g., environment-collision and self-collision constraints). In our proposed approach, given perception inputs, we build a semantic map of the 3D environment and leverage the contextual reasoning capabilities of large language models to infer semantically unsafe conditions. These semantically unsafe conditions are then mapped to safe actions through a control barrier certification formulation. We demonstrate the proposed semantic safety filter in teleoperated manipulation tasks and with learned diffusion policies applied in a real-world kitchen environment that further showcases its effectiveness in addressing practical semantic safety constraints. Together, these experiments highlight our approach's capability to integrate semantics into safety certification, enabling safe robot operation beyond traditional collision avoidance.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Oct 2024.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 8; 2026: 9.

17 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025AGENTSAFE: Benchmarking the Safety of Embodied Agents on Hazardous Instructionscited by 38
  2. 2025Safety Guardrails for LLM-Enabled Robotscited by 35
  3. 2026What Breaks Embodied AI Security:LLM Vulnerabilities, CPS Flaws,or Something Else?cited by 6
  4. 2025IMPACT: Intelligent Motion Planning with Acceptable Contact Trajectories via Vision-Language Modelscited by 5
  5. 2025A Survey of Foundation Models for IoT: Taxonomy and Criteria-Based Analysiscited by 5
  6. 2025From Demonstrations to Safe Deployment: Path-Consistent Safety Filtering for Diffusion Policiescited by 5
  7. 2026Using large language models for embodied planning introduces systematic safety riskscited by 5
  8. 2025Neural Configuration-Space Barriers for Manipulation Planning and Controlcited by 3
  9. 2026Coding Agents with an Obstacle-Aware Harness for Safe Robot Manipulationcited by 3
  10. 2025ResponsibleRobotBench: Benchmarking Responsible Robot Manipulation using Multi-modal Large Language Modelscited by 2
  11. 2025ARMOR: Robust Reinforcement Learning-based Control for UAVs under Physical Attackscited by 1
  12. 2026Toward Generalist Neural Motion Planners for Robotic Manipulators: Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 1
5 more
  1. 2026SSP: Safety-guaranteed Surgical Policy via Joint Optimization of Behavioral and Spatial Constraintscited by 0
  2. 2026LLM-Guided Safety Agent for Edge Robotics with an ISO-Compliant Perception-Compute-Control Architecturecited by 0
  3. 2026NEXUS: Continual Learning of Symbolic Constraints for Safe and Robust Embodied Planningcited by 0
  4. 2026LiftNav: Path Planning via Semantic Lifting in TSDF-Guided Gaussian Splattingcited by 0
  5. 2026Large Language Models in the Loop: A Stability- and Network-Aware Survey in Networked Control, Cyber-Physical, and Multi-Agent Systemscited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Contextual Safety Reasoning and Grounding for Open-World Robots
  2. 2026Predictive Semantic Safety: From Visual Physical Reasoning to Safety-Critical Control
  3. 2024Updating Robot Safety Representations Online from Natural Language Feedback
  4. 2025Generating Robot Constitutions & Benchmarks for Semantic Safety
  5. 2026CoSMO: Conformal Semantic Mapping for Open-World Safe Robot Navigation ↗
  6. 2026CrossSafe: Towards Cross-Embodiment Latent Safety Filters
  7. 2026HazardArena: Evaluating Semantic Safety in Vision-Language-Action Models
  8. 2026Towards General Language-Conditioned Latent Safety Filters