mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

HiPO: Hierarchical Preference Optimization for Adaptive Reasoning in LLMs

arXiv 2604.20140 ↗First posted 22 Apr 2026cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Mathematical reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) is an effective framework for aligning large language models with human preferences, but it struggles with complex reasoning tasks. DPO optimizes for the likelihood of generating preferred over dispreferred responses in their entirety and lacks the granularity to provide feedback on subsections of many-step solutions typical of reasoning tasks. Existing methods excel at either stable preference learning (e.g., DPO variants like KTO and RSO) or structured reasoning (e.g., ReMA's multi-agent RL framework, Tree of Thoughts), but fail to merge these complementary strengths. We propose HiPO (Hierarchical Preference Optimization), an extension of DPO that separates responses into reasoning segments (query clarification and context, reasoning steps, and answer) and computes loss as a weighted sum of the DPO loss for each segment. Our approach enables segment-specific training while maintaining DPO's computational efficiency and training stability. We demonstrate that for multiple 7B LLMs fine-tuned using HiPO and DPO on the Math Stack Exchange preference dataset, the models trained with HiPO outperform the others on a variety of common math benchmarks and achieve greater organization, logical flow, and consistency as measured by GPT-4.1.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Mathematical reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 17 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2026.

Builds on

17 of 19 references.

References · 17

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  4. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  5. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  6. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  7. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
  8. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  9. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
  10. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
  11. 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,155
  12. 2023Statistical Rejection Sampling Improves Preference Optimizationcited by 321
5 more
  1. 2024KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimizationcited by 256
  2. 2023Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmarkcited by 182
  3. 2025ReMA: Learning to Meta-think for LLMs with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 78
  4. 2025Meta-Thinking in LLMs via Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 10
  5. 2024Direct Preference Optimization for Primitive-Enabled Hierarchical RL: A Bilevel Approachcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025HiPO: Hybrid Policy Optimization for Dynamic Reasoning in LLMs
  2. 2024Step-DPO: Step-wise Preference Optimization for Long-chain Reasoning of LLMs
  3. 2025BPO: Revisiting Preference Modeling in Direct Preference Optimization
  4. 2025Probability-Consistent Preference Optimization for Enhanced LLM Reasoning
  5. 2026AdaDPO: Self-Adaptive Direct Preference Optimization with Balanced Gradient Updates
  6. 2025Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Iterative DPO: A Comprehensive Empirical Investigation
  7. 2024Triple Preference Optimization: Achieving Better Alignment using a Single Step Optimization
  8. 2024Self-Training with Direct Preference Optimization Improves Chain-of-Thought Reasoning