mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Auditing and Controlling AI Agent Actions in Spreadsheets

arXiv 2604.20070 ↗First posted 22 Apr 2026cs.HC cs.AI cs.CEcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Advances in AI agent capabilities have outpaced users' ability to meaningfully oversee their execution. AI agents can perform sophisticated, multi-step knowledge work autonomously from start to finish, yet this process remains effectively inaccessible during execution, often buried within large volumes of intermediate reasoning and outputs: by the time users receive the output, all underlying decisions have already been made without their involvement. This lack of transparency leaves users unable to examine the agent's assumptions, identify errors before they propagate, or redirect execution when it deviates from their intent. The stakes are particularly high in spreadsheet environments, where process and artifact are inseparable. Each decision the agent makes is recorded directly in cells that belong to and reflect on the user. We introduce Pista, a spreadsheet AI agent that decomposes execution into auditable, controllable actions, providing users with visibility into the agent's decision-making process and the capacity to intervene at each step. A formative study (N = 8) and a within-subjects summative evaluation (N = 16) comparing Pista to a baseline agent demonstrated that active participation in execution influenced not only task outcomes but also users' comprehension of the task, their perception of the agent, and their sense of role within the workflow. Users identified their own intent reflected in the agent's actions, detected errors that post-hoc review would have failed to surface, and reported a sense of co-ownership over the resulting output. These findings indicate that meaningful human oversight of AI agents in knowledge work requires not improved post-hoc review mechanisms, but active participation in decisions as they are made.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2026.

Builds on

16 of 47 references.

References · 16

  1. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
  2. 2023DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelinescited by 803
  3. 2024InfiAgent-DABench: Evaluating Agents on Data Analysis Taskscited by 134
  4. 2024SpreadsheetBench: Towards Challenging Real World Spreadsheet Manipulationcited by 100
  5. 2023Bridging the Gulf of Envisioning: Cognitive Design Challenges in LLM Interfacescited by 71
  6. 2023RePrompt: Automatic Prompt Editing to Refine AI-Generative Art Towards Precise Expressionscited by 43
  7. 2025Magentic-UI: Towards Human-in-the-loop Agentic Systemscited by 41
  8. 2024WaitGPT: Monitoring and Steering Conversational LLM Agent in Data Analysis with On-the-Fly Code Visualizationcited by 38
  9. 2024Cocoa: Co-Planning and Co-Execution with AI Agentscited by 38
  10. 2023How Do Analysts Understand and Verify AI-Assisted Data Analyses?cited by 25
  11. 2024BISCUIT: Scaffolding LLM-Generated Code with Ephemeral UIs in Computational Notebookscited by 12
  12. 2024VRCopilot: Authoring 3D Layouts with Generative AI Models in VRcited by 10
4 more
  1. 2023PromptInfuser: How Tightly Coupling AI and UI Design Impacts Designers' Workflowscited by 8
  2. 2025Adjust for Trust: Mitigating Trust-Induced Inappropriate Reliance on AI Assistancecited by 6
  3. 2025TableTalk: Scaffolding Spreadsheet Development with a Language Agentcited by 5
  4. 2025Exploring the Challenges and Opportunities of AI-assisted Codebase Generationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.