mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Can Explicit Physical Feasibility Benefit VLA Learning? An Empirical Study

arXiv 2604.17896 ↗First posted 20 Apr 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.ROcited by 0

On the map: Vision-language-action models → Reinforcement learning and post-training

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models map multimodal inputs directly to robot actions and are typically trained through large-scale imitation learning. While this paradigm has shown strong performance, prevailing VLA training procedures do not explicitly supervise hard physical constraints such as obstacle avoidance or kinematic feasibility. As a result, the geometric structure underlying physically feasible behavior must be inferred only implicitly from demonstrations. In this paper, we study whether introducing explicit feasibility supervision can provide effective structured guidance for VLA policies. We formulate a simple geometry-grounded feasibility objective and integrate it into the training stage of a diffusion-based VLA policy. To evaluate this idea systematically, we use obstacle-aware manipulation as a controlled probe of geometry-dependent physical feasibility. Empirical results show that augmenting VLA training with feasibility supervision improves both physical reliability and overall task performance, while also enhancing learning efficiency in the low-data regime. These findings indicate that explicit feasibility signals can effectively complement imitation-based VLA learning, highlighting their potential for developing more reliable VLA policies.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning and post-training, one of 13 directions in Vision-language-action models. Builds on 28 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Apr 2026.

Builds on

28 of 39 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policy20 May

Other references · 27

  1. 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Controlcited by 2,993
  2. 2024OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Modelcited by 2,777
  3. 2023Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusioncited by 2,730
  4. 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,302
  5. 2024π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Controlcited by 2,297
  6. 2022RT-1: Robotics Transformer for Real-World Control at Scalecited by 2,007
  7. 2023Learning Fine-Grained Bimanual Manipulation with Low-Cost Hardwarecited by 1,490
  8. 2023VoxPoser: Composable 3D Value Maps for Robotic Manipulation with Language Modelscited by 733
  9. 2024SpatialVLM: Endowing Vision-Language Models with Spatial Reasoning Capabilitiescited by 679
  10. 2024RDT-1B: a Diffusion Foundation Model for Bimanual Manipulationcited by 670
  11. 2025CoT-VLA: Visual Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Vision-Language-Action Modelscited by 440
  12. 2025UniVLA: Learning to Act Anywhere with Task-centric Latent Actionscited by 386
15 more
  1. 2024Robotic Control via Embodied Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 340
  2. 2021Safe Learning in Robotics: From Learning-Based Control to Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 337
  3. 2025DreamVLA: A Vision-Language-Action Model Dreamed with Comprehensive World Knowledgecited by 203
  4. 2022iSDF: Real-Time Neural Signed Distance Fields for Robot Perceptioncited by 107
  5. 2024Hierarchical Diffusion Policy for Kinematics-Aware Multi-Task Robotic Manipulationcited by 92
  6. 2025Vision-Language-Action Models for Robotics: A Review Towards Real-World Applicationscited by 82
  7. 2022Motion Policy Networkscited by 53
  8. 2025MoManipVLA: Transferring Vision-language-action Models for General Mobile Manipulationcited by 34
  9. 2025VLSA: Vision-Language-Action Models with Plug-and-Play Safety Constraint Layercited by 32
  10. 2025Spatial-Temporal Graph Diffusion Policy with Kinematic Modeling for Bimanual Robotic Manipulationcited by 24
  11. 2022Regularized Deep Signed Distance Fields for Reactive Motion Generationcited by 16
  12. 2023Representing Robot Geometry as Distance Fields: Applications to Whole-body Manipulationcited by 12
  13. 2024Configuration Space Distance Fields for Manipulation Planningcited by 12
  14. 2026Modular Safety Guardrails Are Necessary for Foundation-Model-Enabled Robots in the Real Worldcited by 5
  15. 2024Implicit Safe Set Algorithm for Provably Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026PhysReflect-VLA: Physical Feasibility and Self-Reflective Regulation for Reliable Vision-Language-Action Policies
  2. 2025Towards Deploying VLA without Fine-Tuning: Plug-and-Play Inference-Time VLA Policy Steering via Embodied Evolutionary Diffusion
  3. 2026PhysVLA: Towards Physically-Grounded VLA for Embodied Robotic Manipulation
  4. 2026SimVLA: A Simple VLA Baseline for Robotic Manipulation
  5. 2026Vision-Language-Action Jump-Starting for Reinforcement Learning Robotic Agents
  6. 2025SimpleVLA-RL: Scaling VLA Training via Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2026PAPO-VLA: Planning-Aware Policy Optimization for Vision-Language-Action Models
  8. 2026VLA-ATTC: Adaptive Test-Time Compute for VLA Models with Relative Action Critic Model