mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Persona-Based Requirements Engineering for Explainable Multi-Agent Educational Systems: A Scenario Simulator for Clinical Reasoning Training

arXiv 2604.17186 ↗First posted 19 Apr 2026cs.SE cs.AI cs.ETcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Medical and scientific domain agents

Abstract (arXiv)

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Agentic AI become increasingly integrated across sectors such as education and healthcare, it is critical to ensure that Multi-Agent Education System (MAES) is explainable from the early stages of requirements engineering (RE) within the AI software development lifecycle. Explainability is essential to build trust, promote transparency, and enable effective human-AI collaboration. Although personas are well-established in human-computer interaction to represent users and capture their needs and behaviors, their role in RE for explainable MAES remains underexplored. This paper proposes a human-first, persona-driven, explainable MAES RE framework and demonstrates the framework through a MAES for clinical reasoning training. The framework integrates personas and user stories throughout the RE process to capture the needs, goals, and interactions of various stakeholders, including medical educators, medical students, AI patient agent, and clinical agents (physical exam agent, diagnostic agent, clinical intervention agent, supervisor agent, evaluation agent). The goals, underlying models, and knowledge base shape agent interactions and inform explainability requirements that guided the clinical reasoning training of medical students. A post-usage survey found that more than 78% of medical students reported that MAES improved their clinical reasoning skills. These findings demonstrate that RE based on persona effectively connects technical requirements with non-technical medical students from a human-centered approach, ensuring that explainable MAES are trustworthy, interpretable, and aligned with authentic clinical scenarios from the early stages of the AI system engineering. The partial MAES for the clinical scenario simulator is~hrefhttps://github.com/2sigmaEdTech/MAS/open sourced here.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical and scientific domain agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 7 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Apr 2026.

Builds on

7 of 30 references.

References · 7

  1. 2024Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challengescited by 769
  2. 2019A Grounded Interaction Protocol for Explainable Artificial Intelligencecited by 22
  3. 2019Requirements Engineering Challenges in Building AI-Based Complex Systemscited by 21
  4. 2024AI Agent for Education: von Neumann Multi-Agent System Frameworkcited by 12
  5. 2024How Mature is Requirements Engineering for AI-based Systems? A Systematic Mapping Study on Practices, Challenges, and Future Research Directionscited by 5
  6. 2022Can Requirements Engineering Support Explainable Artificial Intelligence? Towards a User-Centric Approach for Explainability Requirementscited by 4
  7. 2025A Fuzzy Supervisor Agent Design for Clinical Reasoning Assistance in a Multi-Agent Educational Clinical Scenario Simulationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025An Agentic AI Framework for Training General Practitioner Student Skills
  2. 2024PersonaGym: Evaluating Persona Agents and LLMs
  3. 2025A Survey on Human-Centered Evaluation of Explainable AI Methods in Clinical Decision Support Systems
  4. 2025An Explanation-oriented Inquiry Dialogue Game for Expert Collaborative Recommendations ↗
  5. 2026Agentic Persona Generation with Critique-Refinement: An Industrial Evaluation
  6. 2024LLMs Can Simulate Standardized Patients via Agent Coevolution
  7. 2026Educating the Agentic Engineer: Curricula, Collaboration, and Continuous Learning in the AI Era
  8. 2026From Clinical Intent to Clinical Model: Autonomous Coding-Agents for Clinician-driven AI Development