mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

HR-Agents: Using Multiple LLM-based Agents to Improve Q&A about Brazilian Labor Legislation

arXiv 2604.16337 ↗First posted 13 Mar 2026cs.IR cs.AI cs.CYcited by 0

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Legal and financial RAG

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

The Consolidation of Labor Laws (CLT) serves as the primary legal framework governing labor relations in Brazil, ensuring essential protections for workers. However, its complexity creates challenges for Human Resources (HR) professionals in navigating regulations and ensuring compliance. Traditional methods for addressing labor law inquiries often lead to inefficiencies, delays, and inconsistencies. To enhance the accuracy and efficiency of legal question-answering (Q&A), a multi-agent system powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) is introduced. This approach employs specialized agents to address distinct aspects of employment law while integrating Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to enhance contextual relevance. Implemented using CrewAI, the system enables cooperative agent interactions, ensuring response validation and reducing misinformation. The effectiveness of this framework is evaluated through a comparison with a baseline RAG pipeline utilizing a single LLM, using automated metrics such as BLEU, LLM-as-judge evaluations, and expert human assessments. Results indicate that the multi-agent approach improves response coherence and correctness, providing a more reliable and efficient solution for HR professionals. This study contributes to AI-driven legal assistance by demonstrating the potential of multi-agent LLM architectures in improving labor law compliance and streamlining HR operations.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Legal and financial RAG, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 13 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2026.

Builds on

13 of 25 references.

References · 13

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  4. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
  5. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
  6. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
  7. 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,185
  8. 2024Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 506
  9. 2024The Faiss librarycited by 370
  10. 2024Multilingual E5 Text Embeddings: A Technical Reportcited by 357
  11. 2023Multi-Agent Collaboration: Harnessing the Power of Intelligent LLM Agentscited by 329
  12. 2024LLM as a Mastermind: A Survey of Strategic Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 97
1 more
  1. 2023Can GPT-3 Perform Statutory Reasoning?cited by 71

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024HR-Agent: A Task-Oriented Dialogue (TOD) LLM Agent Tailored for HR Applications
  2. 2025When AIs Judge AIs: The Rise of Agent-as-a-Judge Evaluation for LLMs
  3. 2025LexRAG: Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Multi-Turn Legal Consultation Conversation
  4. 2025ASVRI-Legal: Fine-Tuning LLMs with Retrieval Augmented Generation for Enhanced Legal Regulation
  5. 2025GAIus: Combining Genai with Legal Clauses Retrieval for Knowledge-based Assistant
  6. 2026LLM Agents in Law: Taxonomy, Applications, and Challenges
  7. 2024HR-MultiWOZ: A Task Oriented Dialogue (TOD) Dataset for HR LLM Agent
  8. 2026LabourCrew: A Multi-Agent RAG Framework for Trustworthy Adversarial Deliberation and Statutory Reasoning over Labour Law